Exposure 2010Sv NAD 375BEE Worth comparing??

I did get a chance to do this and two of us thought the NAD was good but the Exposure was better. More musical and fluid. If you listen to Metalica all day every day ,maybe the NAD but for everything else (even rock ) we thought the Exposure was great. I keep trying to get rid of it but cannot find anything in the range to take it down. keith

Hi Keith, I understand the Exposure may be better than the NAD; however, the ATC 11 which is a medium size monitor, requires a powerful amp in the 150+ watt category. What speakers did you guys push with the Exposure? I am not sure if it is powerful enough for the ATC.

Neilspeed

I would be curious how your NAD would pair with the ATC 11 as those speakers are quite power hungry but i understand the NADs seem to drive them well.
Hoping for your inputs if you do get the chance to try them out.

I am considering upgrading from my Cambridge Azur 640 A driving Revel F 12 floor standind speakers . What do you guys think would be a better fit for the Revels also do you think either the 2010 or NAD would be a significant improvement over the NAD ? I wrote to Sterophile and they reccomended the NAD.
I live in Pittsburgh and unfortunately there is no place to audition the amps
THANK YOU !
Russ DeJulio
Pittsburgh,PA
[email protected]

My 2004 NAD T773 AVR(145w/ch in stereo) sounds fantastic for 2-channel playback with very good bass drive and plenty of detail. With that said, I am sure the 375BEE will sound and perform even better and should have no problem driving your Revels.

Bill