Pass Labs:What to expect fm XA60.5 to XA100.5

I would expect the XA-100.5 to be "better" than the XA60.5 with the WP Sasha, that amp/speaker combo is better suited to the needs of the WP. But, as Onhwy61 points out, listening is worth 10,000 threads on the topic (now if you can only get rid of preconceptions during the listening - hard to do sometimes).

07-13-10: Onhwy61
If I understand your situation correctly you will have the opportunity to listen to both amplifiers. You will have a better chance of making a good decision if you listen to each one without expectations of what they will or won't do. Listening without preconceptions is a good thing.

07-13-10: Pubul57
I would expect the XA-100.5 to be "better" than the XA60.5 with the WP Sasha, that amp/speaker combo is better suited to the needs of the WP. But, as Onhwy61 points out, listening is worth 10,000 threads on the topic (now if you can only get rid of preconceptions during the listening - hard to do sometimes).

Hi Onhwy/Pubul,

My local dealer unfortunately does not have the XA100.5 or X350.5 in demo to listen/audit. I was even unable to hear XA60.5 before commiting. However prior putting my cash down, I was able to audit the X260.5(mono blocks) and XA30.5 on Sonus Faber Auditor M as the dealer is also a Sonus dealer. I like the mids and highs on the XA.5 but the XA30.5 lows was abit loose and not as articulate sounding as the X260.5. Thinking the XA60.5 monoblocks should better that concern and XA60.5 in my room indeed does better than what i heard on XA30.5 at the dealer's premises.

If not issue in one of the XA60.5's transformer,I would not be given the chance to change/upgrade models. Maybe sometime chance of choices are not that good afterall.

07-13-10: Jpspock
I own a XA100.5 with WP Sasha. Before buying tha XA100.5, I compared it with a XA60.5 that is a very great amp. The difference between both is the bass are far better articulate,with XA100.5. I compared the XA100.5 with the X350.5, and I prefered the XA60 because it's much more musical, you feel more involved into the music. So if you do not need the power of the XA100, go to XA60.5.

Hi Jpspock,
For my info, did you manage to try the XA100.5 and XA60.5 on the same WP Sasha? Was the comparison on the XA60.5 and X350.5 on the same speakers as well? Fully agree that the XA.5 has more magical high and mids than the X.5, that was what i felt when i hear the X260.5 and XA30.5 both on the Sonus Faber Auditor M.

the latest TAS said the Sasha is not an easy speaker to drive, leading me to believe the higher power option is preferable.

in fact, RH said it was the hardest to drive speaker in the Wilson line. ymmv.

Yup, I would think XA100.5 or higher, but those 100s are conervatively rated, might do the trick with the Sashas, but it does seem to be one of those speakers like some Thiels and B&W were the more power the better - they need it.

Hi Elmeroth,

I listened the XA60 and 100.5 the same day on the same Sasha. I compared the X350.5 with 250.5, 600.5 on Sophia2 and the on WP8. One thing is very important too : the preamp. I have compared the XP10 and XP20 with XA100.5 and X600.5 and XP20 is much better : wider and deeper image, deeper and articulate bass, magnificient midrange. So when you will listen to those gears, don't forget the impact of the preamp, because it can change everything.