Final verdict with amplifier


Hey all,
I recently posted how my Parasound amp wasn't providing much of an improvement on my Klipsch WF-34 speakers, which are rated at 125W RMS, and 300W peak, and my amp being 205W per channel. Most of the responses that I got was that I needed a decent preamp to integrate into my system. Well recently a buddy gave me his old Carver TFM 55 amplifier, rated at 380 Watts per channel 600 Watts mono, so I decided to give it a whirl. I know that I have to be careful cuz that much power could blow the fecal matter out of my speakers. Well I hooked it up BOTH WAYS. It was slightly better on stereo, and mono was a big difference, but even cranked it didn't harm my speakers. why is that? And how is a preamp supposed to help any of that?
kornkat2020
You keep getting not very good amplifiers with tons of power, way more than your easy to drive speakers need and expect a big difference.

I disagree that preamps are more important than amps. I think they're both important. Although to what degree depends on the components and the rest of the system.

With your fairly easy to drive speakers, you should be looking for quality not power. I'd guess that a good but cheap integrated, perhaps even a lowly Trends T-amplifier, perhaps something from Virtue, a Virtue One would slay anything you've tried so far.
There is a Dayens Ampino asking $450 and a Sansui integrated asking $350 in Solid State Integrated Amplifiers right now. The latter you should ask regarding current restoration status, if the system has been re-capped etc. But both are likely to be clearly superior to your current system (and probably your friends too).
The amp is the heart of your system. No matter what you upgrade or change otherwise, you will always end up listening to your amp, again. I can't believe that Son of Ampzilla is still for sale in the classifieds, recently rebuilt by none other than Mike Bettinger. This amp is 30 years old and will go toe to toe with anything on the planet, current or otherwise