From Klipsch to Zu Omen Def


I have auditioned many speakers and have yet to find one that best my current Klipsch RF-7 for the type of music I listen to (Classic rock, singer songwriter, Indie Rock). I have tried Martin Logan, B&W, Von Schwikert and have liked aspects of all but not enough to make a change. I have been very intrigued by the Zu Omen Def but have not been able to hear them. I am hoping to improve the soundstage size, RF-7s are very direct and therefore not as big sounding as some speakers. I also hope to get more out of the midrange, vocals can sound a bit hollow at times.

Has anyone compared Klipsch to Zu? Specifically the Zu Omen Def?
macallan7
Yep. That's how I'd characterize the difference between VSA and Klipsch.

Though the VSA can be goosed to be more forward and fast with careful equipment matching, just as Klipsch and Zu can be tamed a bit with certain set-ups.
I have still yet to pull the trigger. Now the Druid V's are out what are thoughts on the Omen Def vs the Druid? I like the dynamics of my klipsch but want smoother mids (vocals specifically)
Macallan7,

I have owned a pair of Klipsch RF-63's since May 2008 and have had many opportunities to "upgrade" to RF-7's, RF-83's, RF-7II's, and other brands but just can't accept that any of these would be "better". The 63's have that classic Klipsch forward sound with unlimited dynamics but with a smoothness and very accurate midrange that I have yet heard in a 2-way tower at it's pricepoint.

Just suggesting a more refined Klipsch Reference tower before you try another brand.

Bill
Look at the Klipsch Heritage line. Much better for two channel listening than the Reference speakers.

Shakey