Question on FR 66s

Dear Halcro: Here you can corroborate everything what I posted. This is through the VE calculator:

http://www.vinylengine.com/tonearm_alignment_calculator_pro.php?arm1=Arm+1&l1=ps&a1lv=233&a1=st&oh1v=&oa1v=&arm2=Lofgren+A&l2=ps&a2lv=&a2=la&oh2v=&oa2v=&arm3=Lofgren+B&l3=ps&a3lv=&a3=lb&oh3v=&oa3v=&arm4=Stevenson&l4=ps&a4lv=&a4=st&oh4v=&oa4v=&og=iec1&ogv=&ig=iec&igv=&cal=y&submit=calculate

at the end of the page you can read what I posted in Agon in that 2011 posts but with different words. I hope you can trust on VE!.

Regards and enjoy the music,
R.

Dear Thuchan: I can and I did question/questioned you about your opinion but I can't remember that I questioned you or any one else that if it is true that you own/owned some audio item you mentioned about. As a fact I don't remember any single forum member that in the past did it with other member.

I remember that one time you posted that were along other gentleman the designer/manufacturer of your own speakers: I repeat self co-designer. Remember? and remember what happened down that thread ? do you want to talk about or about your co-designer/partner acts AGAIN?

I have nothing to hide but you are questioning my integrity and then I take it as personal injury and don't think that I can accept it by " free ".

R.

Lew,
Of course some people prefer Stevenson alignment for various reasons.....however the vast majority of audiophiles are using Lofgren A(Baerwald) because of the lower overall distortions.

Stevenson - a variation on Löfgren geometry optimized for low distortion at the inner groove at the expense of increased distortion elsewhere.

The Vinyl Engine Calculator is designed for this most popular (and lower distortion producing) geometry although they do have calculators for the others if you so desire?

The real point of all this is that Raul selected the Stevenson alignment (which he doesn't use himself)........to prove that my 233mm P to S distance is 0.3mm out?
Instead of having to concur that I have the tonearm set up correctly for interchangeability of headshells (according to Baerwald)........he will grasp at the ridiculous to avoid admitting defeat?
It demonstrates the almost psychotic paranoia which governs his behaviour.

If you remember about 2 or 3 years ago.....there was an entire Thread here on Audiogon which discussed all the Pros and Cons of the various geometries.....and even personalised geometries which one can adapt for certain requirements?
Dertonearm provided sufficient evidence in long and protracted postings.....which demonstrated the sheer lack of credibility and understanding that Raul has about this whole subject.
I hope that Thread is still in the Archives but I doubt it as Raul became more and more belligerent and personal....which is his Modus Operandi whenever cornered?

Housewives of Audiogon

Dear Halcro: ++++ " The real point of all this is that Raul selected the Stevenson alignment (which he doesn't use himself)........to prove that my 233mm P to S distance is 0.3mm out?
Instead of having to concur that I have the tonearm set up correctly for interchangeability of headshells (according to Baerwald)........he will grasp at the ridiculous to avoid admitting defeat? " +++++

wrong again, a misunderstood. I don't took Stevenson ( FR took it. ) to prove that you are out for 0.3mm because as you admit you has an overhang of 12mm ( to match the 66. ): you showed in the calculator link you posted!!

++++ " instead of having to concur that I have the tonearm set up correctly for interchangeability of headshells (according to Baerwald). " +++++

wrong again, Baerwald ( IEC/DIN ) does not shows 12mm on overhang with 233 on StP distance. Where do you read it?

Btw, in no one of the posts that gentleman could prove any of his theories, I have the posts.
Now, don't talk prove what you post. Bla, bla, bla,.. means nothing: where are those facts that are the foundation of your posts?

In the other side the discussion is between you and me: why brought here the name of a third or fourth person trying to convince ( your self because you can't convince any one else. ) or prove what you can't do it because your whole subject misunderstood? or only are trying to distract from the main subject: your misunderstood.

Just for your records here a discussion between your third/hero person and other agoner on tonearms:

http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&255&4#255

http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&256&4#256

http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&276&4#276

http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&277&4#277

http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&278&4#278

http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245780214&openflup&280&4#280

three times in a row in the same thread your hero was defeated.

Have you enough or will come back for more?

Regards and enjoy the music,
R.