Bought my first new audiophile LP...back it goes


I opened my 200g pressing of Neil Young's "Prairie Wind" today. Had my Audio Intelligent cleaner all ready to go. Slipped the first licorice disc out of it's poly record sleeve...and it had three 3"x1/2" stains of some kind. I gently tried to clean them off using AI step 1 and AI step 2 and a soft cotton cloth, but to no avail. One other side was stained, too. So, back it goes to Elusive Disc. For $40 I expect the vinyl to be pristine and absolutely free of defects or stains.

Is this common with new audiophile vinyl? What a hassle...
tvad
many pressing plants (this practice started back in the late 70's)use recycled vinyl. the plants themselves are more primitive than ever (old equipment,etc) because its becoming impossible to make money given the lp's tiny marketshare. even the 'virgin vinyl' product is not what it used to be.
I just got the new Diana Krall as well- the center hole was not punched through, and the vinyl surface is noisy and distorted- very disappointing. Some of the others from Classic have been superb.
I don't buy new "audiophile" vinyl, but I have bought vinyl reissues that happen to have been 180g pressings, mostly Sundazed but also some others, and most were warped to some extent right out of the wrapper (several also had some instances of intermitent noise pressed in the grooves). Personally I like standard weight pressings better; the more flexible records clamp to the platter more positively and seem to stand less chance of being warped. I think that if you are clamping, there is no real advantage to heavier pressings over a good-quality 120g ones. To me the whole heavy vinyl thing is a marketing gimmick to charge audiophiles extra, and apparently it has worked.
I just bought the new Analog Productions re issue of Fragile by Yes. Fortunately, I have a couple good copies of this early art rock classic. This rendiion sounds very harsh. Why it almost sounds like a CD.
DUZENT anyBody prevuiew theere poststs bfore submittng? Sum of hta pspelling iz relly pour.
-John