Born to Run: Why the Poor Sound Quality?


I have always been disappointed with the sound quality of Bruce Springsteen's Born to Run. Even the CBS 1/2 Speed Master pressing is underwhelming. Is there a good explanation for this? As I recall, Jon Landau produced the album, and he is certainly no slouch, but the recording seems inferior.

It's really a shame that there doesn't seem to be a decent pressing of this classic album
jeffreybowman2k
Agreed-
Springsteen did have a big hand in all aspects of this album! As we all know now, this was his last attempt at a Hit before his Label dropped him.
Wild Billy's Circus Story - that's my favorite Springsteen cut if we're talking sonics. Springsteen's early stuff was pure magic at the time.
I am not sure I am buying the claim that Springsteen wanted the album to sound gritty or whatever. My take is that, like most of the pop records of that era, record companies were encountering greatly increasing costs due to the artists' fighting for a greater piece of the financial pie. The area over which the record companies still had almost total control was in recording and producing records. Since they figured few people took care of their records nor cared how they sounded, they saved costs by putting out wretchedly bad-sounding records. I have listened to many versions of this LP including the Classic and the half-speed, and it appears as if the problems is the recording itself. Like they say, you cannot polish a turd.
springsteen has had total control, since record 'one', thanks to john hammond. close enough for rock and roll
Chadnliz, the first time that I put on my British Harvest copy of "Animals" was a revelation; this is a very finely recorded album that must've gotten the bums rush in the US pressings. Search it out, it is not expensive and the sound quality is fantastic. I would say the same for "WYWH" if you are looking for a nice pressing of that, as well.