Inner wax writings


I have often noticed "Masterdisk" imprint around dead wax...some impressions appear handwritten and some typographical. Any informed theory/knowledge/reference would be greatly appreciated.
digmusic
Marty, your reputation precedes you. Does dead wax scribbling tell you anything more about the pressing, the era, the LP...etc?
I can't really talk about my reputation with the court case still pending, but I can say that I was not in Chicago that night and the baby doesn't look a thing like me.

You will find lots of stuff in the dead wax and a good part of it is dictated by the label, not the mastering lab. I am hardly the authority on this stuff. Usually, the catalogue number (just thought I'd throw one in for our Brit friends)and matrix number. This information can either be type set or hand scribed. The catalogue number is self explanatory, but the matrix number can tell you what master, mother and stamper were used. Unforunately, there was no standard for this and various labels used different systems of encoding this information, but most of this info is available on the net. The catalogue numbers are generally temporally sequential, and that allows one to broadly date the recording sessions in most cases. The presumption is that the earlier stampers and masterings are better. This is pretty much a trap. Take a common rock album, "Who's Next" for instance. The first Brit pressing, on Trak is quite nice. The second pressing was mastered by Denis Blackham, this is known because his signature, hand scribed, "Bilbo" is in the dead wax. It is, arguably, the best pressing of this old war horse out there and by a very wide margin. BTW his current website for Skye Mastering is a model of the type:

http://www.skyemastering.com/pictures.html

Broadly speaking the best pressings are from the country where the record label is located, as often, masters are not allowed to travel to other countries and safety masters, which are one generation away, are used in other markets. But record producing, mastering and pressing were really pretty loosely structured in the sense that, as soon as you think that you have a rule, you find some recording that breaks it.

Once in a while, some wag, will also scribe a message in the dead wax and there are many threads on Vinyl Asylum detailing these scribblings. "My Cat Is Dead", etc.

In the US, some of the most highly regarded mastering houses are:

Artisan Sound their logo is an "A" with rings around it like the planet Saturn. It kind of looks like a space ship.

Sterling Sound You will find a small type set "sterling"

The Mastering Lab "TML" typeset, Doug Sax worked here and often you will find his initials in the dead wax. He also mastered all of the Sheffeld Labs recordings.

"Van Gelder" typeset, Rudy Van Gelder is certainly the best known recording engineer and mastering engineer in all of Jazz. He worked for all of the major jazz labels, and engineered many of the touchstone recordings of the golden age of jazz at his recording studio in scenic New Jersey.

There are many other good mastering houses, perhaps someone else will chime in.
Thanks for sharing...To follow up on the master/safety distinction: Japanese LPs seem to command some price premium over the years reflecting better quality. Would you say part of that quality is in their mastering process?

Certain Blue Note dates were never released domestically while Japan got the 1st pressing. Any comment about that?
IMHO, some Japanese pressings are sought after, not for their mastering quality, but for their pressing quality. When we started using recycled vinyl, chopping up records to make yet more records, the Japanese were still producing a premium product with virgin vinyl and greater care in the pressing process. This is why the surfaces are almost always better on the Japanese product. MoFi started by having their records pressed in Japan and these are fantastically quiet records. These early MoFis were also mastered by one of the greatest mastering engineers of all time, Stan Ricker and they are as good as records get. Unfortunately, Gary Georgi took over the mastering chores and his hearing issues caused the skewed frequency response that one hears on the middle period MoFis. The horrible MoFi Aja being a good example of mastering gone bad. The Japanese were big jazz fans and a giant market for relatively small labels like Blue Note, so they did get unique product from time to time. And Blue Note also just shelved some sessions deciding that either there was no market for the product, or performances that were not consonant with their artistic sensibilites. But Japanese mastering being better? Not in my personal, subjective experience, at all. As an example, take the much poo pooed Japanese Pink Floyd "The Wall", Japanese CBS/Sony 40AP1750, HP's list and all that. The early US pressing, Columbia PAL 36184 with Mastering Lab "TML" stampers just kills it. Same for almost all original Blue Notes compared to the King Japanese product. And no Japanese jazz release, that was also released here, would command a higher price than a clean original pressing. The difference, in some cases, would be thousands of dollars. Others are free to disagree, but I own lots of these recordings and most of the Japanese stuff has incredibly silent surfaces and sounds like it was not only made from safety masters but that the mastering engineers leaned on the frequency response a tad. YMMV.
I have been thinking about getting some Mofi but am not sure if those have gone thru too much EQ…any comments on those copies? I’m particularly interested in getting some Supertramp (Crime/Quietest… what I refer to as the Supertramp trilogy). Any thoughts?
More to discover