1. Home
  2. music
  3. 1251761987

Rolling Stone top 100 Guitarists - Howe/Van Halen

OK, I just listened to The Yes Album for about the millionth time and I have one question; how on earth did the dudes at Rolling Stone put Steve Howe at number 69 on their list? I realize they tend to be a holier than thou (or smarter-than-thou) bunch, but come on. Didn't this guy win like every guitar award from musician magazines in the 70's? I was shocked as I read through the list and saw the names ahead of him. I just assumed he would be in the top 10 for unbelievable technical skill alone. The guy is simply amazing. I don't want to start a debate on some of the extremely questionable picks, especially in the top 10, but this guy is one of the all time greats.

To me it's like forgetting about Stan Musial because he played in St Louis instead of NY, LA or Chicago. Still one of the all time greats.

That brings me to the most amazing slight on that list: Eddie Van Halen at 70??? Didn't he basically invent speed metal? His tapping technic along with the rest of his unbelievable arsenal should put him in the top 10 if not the top 5, I mean come on. Because they didn't like Van Halen's pop/Rock they shun him down to 70?? I'm not a huge Van Halen fan but I think they had 2 great albums (Van Halen, 1984) and his playing on those alone should get him in the top 10.

I kept thinking that with the exceptions, IMO, of Jimmy Hendrix, Stevie Ray Vaughn and Kirk Hammett no one else could play all the music of all the other guitarists as well as VH could. George Harrison, Keith Richards, Eric Clapton or The Edge getting through 'Eruption', 'Ain't Talkin' Bout Love' or 'Hot for Teacher'? I don't think so. I can't think of anything Van Halen couldn't play extremely well, both artistically and technically.

Most the "Greatest" lists are BS, but this instance seemed really egregious to me.
macdadtexas
crankshaft
26 posts
 
I don't remember which magazine it was, it was late 1990's.
One of these mags had Bevies & Butthead listed. They even had them listed above real guitarist ! I remember a friend of mine was all tore up because B&B was rated higher than Ted Nugent ! Come on now, all politics aside Bevies & Butthead out playing Uncle Ted !
Take these ratings with a grain of salt !
chatta
314 posts
 
Bongofury, I agree that Rolling Stone does tend to miss a lot of the top people when they do their lists. There are several drummers that did not appear on the list that should have.
6550c
393 posts
 
Instrumental guitarists never get much attention.
Steve has done tons of solo acoustic guitar work that is great and amazing but not what pop or rock radio would want. I have learned to play guitar, so SH is great to learn from. I now think he is one of the masters and should be much higher on the all time greats list. Knowing how to play guitar really allows one to determine who is really good and who is not. Not what the media or some top 100 list tells us.
I'm am now just discovering Steve Howe for the first time.
In the 1970s he and Yes were, imo somewhat bybassed because it wasn't hard and heavy like AC/DC etc. At that time we wanted to play like Aerosmith or Zepp.
tvad
9,467 posts
 
In the 1970s he and Yes were, imo somewhat bybassed because it wasn't hard and heavy like AC/DC etc.
6550c (Threads | Answers | This Thread)
Were you around in the 70s?

Among my peers in the 70s, Howe was regarded as a guitar genius, and Yes were immensely popular...equal to Aerosmith, more than AC/DC, and unquestionably more respected as musicians.

Maybe it has to do with the people we hung out with. Many of my friends were musicians and rabid music fans.
macdadtexas OP
1,794 posts
 
Every time I listen to any Yes album, I am shocked that Steve Howe is somehow forgotten.

They guy is an absolute genius, and I have never been a huge YES fan. But how can you not just marvel at the artistry of this guy?

Does anyone know what he has been doing lately?
More to discover