Tac T owner opinons

Tact 2.2x with upgraded powersupply owner
use to run it as a preamp/DAC combo- Preamp was subpar without the powersupply upgrade. THIS IS A REQUIREMENT
DAC's are pretty good as I had to go to Theta GenVIII to beat it (pretty obvious) but still equal to 4-5k CD players and a bargain.

Stay away from the 2.0 original unless you want to play, it is way harder to use.
the 2.0s is the newer version and similar to the 2.2x but without the ability to control a sub or biamp directly
the 2.2 is a really really old version and is not even close to the 2.2x.

The Tact has balanced analog output on the DAC boards(optional) on the 2.2x (not sure if it is fully balanced)

I am currently only using it to clean up my Squeezebox and crappy over compressed recording. My main purpose has been to use it to mic my room and adjust my treatments (ended up removing and moving treatments and listening position and speakers.) Life is so much easier when you can see things..

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TacTAudioUsersGroup/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TacTHackers/

A lot of tact users hang out at www.audiocircle.com.

Later i will work with the room correction as I found it very difficult to understand.. there is no docs from Tact you have to download the huge FAQ's from the Tact Forum which give you a fighting chance.. Granted I didn't spend but a couple of days on it.

Chris

I have an orig 2.0 with aaa/ddd options. Yes, the power upgrade is necessary. I use mine for eq and conversion. I have used it as a pre, (it's pretty weak) but my Emotive Audio is much better.

Is that stupid to have a $10K pre on the back of such modest dacs and noise? Let's put it this way. 30 years of hi end dogma taught me to stay away from eq. I had Genesis 501's, Cain and Cain Ben's and Quads in the room both before and during the tenure of this unit. All excellent speakers and all RADICALLY different sounding.

IT'S THE ROOM. You've got to get it out of the way and Tacts or Rives or other digital eq is the only way to do it. I'm "screwing up" expensive and high quality signal sources from a VDH Black Beauty, Ensemble phonobrio, Wadia 830, etc., according to purists. I'm definitely converting excellent analog signals to digital and back (and I'd like to avoid it), but if the signal is pure, and still sounds like hell due to my room, then I'll just have to "distort" it in order to make it sound like music.

I've suffered as a purist for years with room nodes and resonances. Great equipment and expensive upgrades that never really went anywhere near as far as needed.

I play trumpet in a big band, cornet is a community band, have taught horn and played in orchestras. Until 5 years ago, I played bass (I'm 50) with a Fender Jazz and Aguilar tube amplification through Euphonic Audio boxes. I have a pretty good idea of what real music sounds like.

If I have a fire, my TACT (upgraded and hopefully, a later series) is going to be the first thing I grab, after my Wife and kid: they can carry the Emotive and Shunyata Hydra.

By the way, the TACT documentation is straight from hell and you have to work with the equipment in order to make heads or tails out of it. the websites are a saving grace and absolutely necessary. The learning curve is steep. It took me two weeks to build and "save" my first one. However, when you do, you'll never go back, no matter how "pure" and fine your other hardware is, unless you have the luck and money to have an acoustically correct listening room constructed for you.

I've had mine for 2 years now and still learning things about it, but I 've got the basics down.

Just my HO,

Jeff

Good summary- thanks.

If I'm fair only on the technically skilled side, would the Tac Ts be tough for me?

And does the Parc do the same thing as the Tac T, but is simpler to use?

The Parc can only do one thing that the Tact can do and that's to cut bass peaks (3 of them) it is an analog device that allows you to cut bass peaks where the room can not be fixed or accoustical treatments are not possible (WAF)

The Tact is a digital eq (put between digital source and DAC or preamp if DAC card is used) (it can also be used with analog input board but that is pretty good but not for the person with a 20k turntable rig (aka a Parc then becomes the right answer for those customers with TT's)graphic eq (2.0 = 12 bands, and the 2.0s/2.2x does 16 or 18 bands) that can cut and add(be careful and don't do this) plus what the 2.2x allows you to factor in the time delay between the main speakers and the sub(s) plus it can compensate for sidewall reflections and calculate/remove those wavs and adjust the timing in the digital domain. You can have EQ presets to tame 80's and 90's recording, boost midbass for a little Disco when the need arrise... etc... this is really cool feature that I use with music I love that is unlistenable on my system otherwise because of the poor recording.

The Tact has an automode that is quick and simple but doesn't really work... if you have patience and don't expect a stick the component in change you will get huge benifit's. This is one reason I haven't sold mine is that I know the potential is there if I can just sit down and work with it.

PS: Jeff - well stated... even though I only got it partially working that magic was truely addictive and it will be impossible to live without it later..

Chris

The hard core TacT users/tweakers are now here:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRealTacTHackers/

A power supply upgrade for the RCS is just a start.

TacT will introduce a new version of the RSC, the 2.2XP
at CES this week with their new DRC software.

LyngdorfAudio(new name for TacTDK) will also be showing their Room Perfect, room correction module for the TDA2200+.