Help me decide on cryo option.


Hi everyone,
I'm planning to replace the sixteen EL34s in my cj mono-blocks. Even though there seems to be a consensus that output tubes make relatively little contribution to the sound of an amp, at least when compared to the small tubes, I would still like to get this right. I'm pretty well set on the Sventlana Winged C's but here's the thing: The source I'm intending to use offers a regular quad for $92.80 and a cryoed quad for $164.80. With sixteen tubes, I don't consider the price difference chump change. I realize this all comes down to value judgments that no one can really make for me, but I sure would appreciate any opinions and experiences. Thanks in advance.
phaelon
Thank you for responding.

Thorman - This is the first time I've heard about the additional warmth factor. Has this been your experience with audio cryogenics in general; Geoffkait's impression is more typical of what I've heard.

Tvad - As Geoffkait and Dbld pointed out, there are less expensive alternatives. Have you ever found cryoing to be beneficial and cost effective?
Have you ever found cryoing to be beneficial and cost effective?
Phaelon (Threads | Answers)
I have not heard benefits of cryo'd tubes versus non cryo'd tubes. In fact, I have often preferred the no cryo'd versions in those few instances when I have been able to compare.
Phaelon: When I inquired about the SED el34 cryos at ( tubedepot.com )I was told they would definately be sweeter in sound..but in my system they made me also change other ( brighter ) tubes to offset the extra warmth that the cryod el34 were giving me..I then went back to my Original SED el34 quads and I got back the detail and midrange I was used to...For me it was a bust..For double the cost it aint worth it.....For me anyway!