anyone listened to iTunes Plus on high end system?


Just curious if anyone has taken a recording of an iTunes plus AAC 256k file and compared an actual CD version on a high end system. I know AAC is "lossy", but was wondering if there was a human ear difference. On my low to mid-fi system, I cannot hear a difference. And I have really sensitive ears. I'd like to hear from the high end world.
aberyclark
Thanks Knownothing, that was the type of answer I was looking for. I believe my weak link is my speakers. I tried a comparison with a classical piece (cd version compared to itunes plus), there was more dynamics and air on the redbook compared to the cd I burned with the aac file. The first test was "hard rock" which was quite a bit compressed in the first place. It was harder for me to tell a difference. The 256 acc, however, did sound quite good and if I did not have the original CD, would have been quite happy. I hope HD tracks keeps expanding...and hopefully, Apple will have lossless downloads one day.
Note - just in case someone is tracking along - there is a big difference between what Abery is listening to - AAC@256 and what Knownothing is referencing which is AIFF (uncompressed format)

Absolutely no comparison
For what it is worth - it usually doesn't take a remarkably good system to tell the difference between standard iTunes 128kps AAC fiels and iTunes Plus 256kps AAC files. The Plus files usually connect the musical dots better in every way.