Upgrade Quandry - Who's on first?


Here is the current system:

Snell Type C V Speakers
NAD 2700 thx times 2 Amplifiers
Rotel RCC 1055 CD Player
Basis 1400 Turntable
Simaudio Moon LP 3 phono pre
Sonic Frontiers SFL-2 tube Tube preamp
Straightwire virtuoso Speaker cable
Sumiko Bluepoint Special No 2 Cartridge
Signal Cable Magic Power Power Cord Tweak
APC Power Conditioner H 10 Tweak
DIY BASS TRAPS/PANELS

What is next for a $1200 upgrade? I was thinking a new cdp or perhaps more powerful amps. As to the cdp the Sony XA 5400 es has been highly touted in some circles.
CLueless on the amp situation but I know the solid state is good for me and that with my current bi amped setup I am only geting 150 watts per channel and the Snells can take a lot more than that.
I listen to cds 70% ,classic rock, bluegrass some classical and jazz to.
Suggestions?
128x128blueskiespbd
Blueskiespbd, I know the Moon LP3. I think it is terrific value and would sound even better with a battery PS. So I wouldn't consider changing that at this point if your very nice system were mine.

I do know that a preamp makes a huge difference in a system and I know other SF gear. I think that you would be pleased with the difference if you tried a preamp worth $1200 more than the SF in your system. (Actually a Klyne SK-5A like mine would probably cost about the same as the SF.) I do believe that the SF, especially retubed, is a big improvement over the Linn Kolektor.

I'm hoping you'll post your impressions of the Aragon.
That Klyne sounds like a fine machine especially the phono section. How is it different from the Sonic?
Oh dear, now I think I've intrigued you. Well, no harm done I hope. The Klyne is solid-state, to start with. Which of course means nothing, it's not the technology but the implementation that counts. It is discontinued, like the SF, but went that way much longer ago, back in the eighties. It has a MM/MC phono stage and a very good one. I think you would find it had higher resolution than the SF, to judge from the other SF gear I know, but I have not made the comparison.

And just to repeat, I don't know all your gear and I am sure you are right to be looking at your amplification at this time. I understood your post to mean, "What else would you guys upgrade, apart from what I'm already thinking?" and I hope I haven't driven you too far afield. Funny thing though, Kal Rubinson compared the SF2 with a Klyne 6.3 back when he reviewed the SF2 for Stereophile.
No decision made so far as to what the next step should be other than reading, researching and listening for good advice.
You know sometimes you just want to replace everything and start fresh.