Your vote: Most Useless Audio Adjective


From what I've seen in online audio discussion forums such as Audiogon, words like warm, taut, wooly, and forward can upset even died in the wool audiophiles. While some may have a hard time getting their arms around them, most of the terms seem quite appropriate to me. You have to develop some list of terms in order to convey a description of a component's sonics, or to delineate it from another component.

However, I have noticed the description "self effacing" creeping into more and more reviews, and it flat out boggles my mind. Initially, it seemed to fit into the context it was being used - affordable or downright cheap gear, that was fun and lively. However, now that I've read the term being used to describe quite a serious piece of high end kit, the time has come to point out how ridiculous things are getting.

I had to laugh out loud thinking of the snootiest, most condescending audio dealer I know who was carrying this brand. Using the term "self effacing" with anything had to do with this guy was akin to describing Phyllis Diller a young, hot sex symbol.

What is your most useless audio adjective???
trelja
Extended highs works for weather and pot though. I agree that it's difficult to find an adequate vocabulary to describe sound or the character of sound or the reproduction of sound. But as imprecise as most of these terms prove to be what choice do we have if we want to communicate with each other about the subject? Obviously agreement on the meanings of terms would be a good beginning but as imperfect as our language might be, it's all we've got!
Having looked through all the replies, it seems nearly all adjectives and adverbs used in formal and/or informal audio reviews are considered useless by someone.

Which renders the entire thread useless, IMO.
Which renders the entire thread useless, IMO.

So in a backwards kind of way the most useless word in this thread is indeed useless.

I suppose we're now asymptotically approaching the tautological, which may be as close to consensus as we'll get.

Tim
 
Tautological? Had to bust out the Websters...

"1. needless repetition of an idea, esp. in words other than those of the immediate context, without imparting additional force or clearness"

Tautological indeed, Tim!