Reused Item Photos. Misleading?

Hey I pay for my feedback fair and square, just like the next guy. And Kurt, when I said the amp was "near mint", I meant that it was on the shelf next to a mint amp.

Jaybo, in my world, 7 is the new 4. But I digress..........

That was clever of you Marty, accepting my suggestion to use "But I digress..."

Now that I'm convinced you're a clever writer, I want to make an offer on those Bose 901's Danlib1 foolishly mentioned returning.

My bid is $15.500.00 or best offer above that, whatever you say. My jaw hit the floor when I didn't hear those in my system.

Now if only I could find a way to work PRAT into this post.

"And Kurt, when I said the amp was "near mint", I meant that it was on the shelf next to a mint amp."

That reminds me of the story of the rich bank vice-president who has a 2nd story office directly over the vault. His assits over a couple million dollars.

Come on Guys - PLEASE, lets concentrate on the subject.
Seriously.
Personally, I would never use some-"body's" pictures to try selling my less then perfect beloved treasures........?
Well, maybe in one case, but I don't think she would be happy to hear that 7 is actually 4. Anyway, Viridian can you hook the brother up with some curvy/mint pictures.

On a serious note - as suggested ;) - The copying of others auction photos was part of a major scam on eBay where they would use the photo of someone else's auction and then say "Don't contact us via eBay - email us direct" with offer to sell very high end equipment for GBP700.