Pictures, More Pictures


I've got two ads running right now. Both have pictures and both have good descriptions. There have been many contacts but no questions other than "will you ship to Europe?".
There have been several contacts, however, requesting more pictures.
What gives? Are these people assembling scrapbooks?
macrojack
One may not need many pictures, but front and back are a must. I am always amazed when some gear has two or three pictures of the front and none of the back. Having the back of the gear shown can convey a lot of information and answer a lot of questions.
Well, here's my take. Many of my replies have been from Europe.
There are many excellent photos available to demonstrate configuration and function available on the Rowland website and, for Zu, on the 6moons site. In both cases the photography far exceeds what I am capable of providing.

What I have experienced so far, has been people who ask no questions about the gear and do not indicate what they are hoping to see. They just ask for hi-rez pictures.

And finally, the Rowland stuff is notoriously difficult to photograph well and the Zu speakers are a copper metal flake that glows. It picks up the faintest bit of light and exaggerates it. In the morning the sun reflecting off these speakers makes the wall look like it is on fire.

Believe it or not, in both cases, I selected the best of a dozen shots before I posted them.

You gotta buy the product, not the pictures. And you gotta trust the feedback, at least a little. I get a lot of comfort or a sense of aversion by talking to people. That's why I often include a phone number with my responses, just in case other people feel they can learn something from personal communication.

My feedback is strong and my patterns of buying and selling indicate that I am a binge trader. In other words, I am not a dealer, just a guy who periodically goes on a buying and selling update spree.

I can't help but think these photo buyers (if they really are buyers) are going to be photoshopped out of a lot of money someday.

It wasn't so long ago that we bought stuff like this with no photos whatsoever. Why are they imperative now?

DCSTEP - Will you please lighten up on the Rowland promotion? You are way out of context. And besides, I bought my first piece of Rowland gear from Jeff in 1979 when he was making stuff in his garage without a brand name. It was a full function, battery-powered preamp. Rod Thompson and I worked for the Crisman Speaker Company together in 1976. I think I can proceed without your guidance and prompting.
7 out of 9 folks who have responded to this thread are of the opinion that the requests for additional photos are reasonable, and that at the very least front and back photos are a must. The other two responses were essentially off topic and made no mention of photos. So, 100% of the responses that were on topic recommend more than one photo.

That's pretty definitive in favor of more pictures.
As a buyer, I don't like buying anything I can't see. The more I can see the better. It blows my mind when I see an ad with just a model number, no description of the items purpose (amp, etc.) not even a photo. As a seller I want to create the most interest and comfort level possible in the buyer. I try to take photos (I too find it hard to take good photos) that show as many sides as possible and any paraphernalia that goes with it: remote, manual, etc. A good ad ultimately saves time and will help it sell faster. But no matter what you do, as Usblues pointed out, when you put it out there, you have to be ready for a few chain yankers.