noble100
Responses from noble100
| Class D = Trash? stevecham, You asked:"I'm not reading consistent sonic and utility praise for the format. Why is that?" I can only speak for myself but I think many class D users will probably agree with my answer to your question. I don't specifically ... | |
| Class D is just Dandy! Very nice to see almarg and atmasphere team-up, step up and use their knowledge/experience to solve islandmandan's noise problem. Nice job guys! What I've consistently noticed from listening to good class D amps in my system, from my init... | |
| Class D = Trash? teo audio, I haven’t heard the affects of music described like that before but I liked it.Well said! Thank you, Tim | |
| Need Power Amp advice trip, I used an Aragon 4004 MKII to drive a pair of fairly inefficient Magnepans for several years. It's a good amp that I thought sounded good in my system from top to bottom. I know from personal experience, however, that there's a very af... | |
| Class D = Trash? " Not one mention of the output filter that has to address the switching noise of the switching frequency, which is the Achilles Heel with present day switching frequencies."George, I understand the importance of having a good well matched pas... | |
| Class D is just Dandy! randy-11:"Can anybody list very affordable great sounding Class D amps - say below $2,000 for a stereo pair, and better or comparable SQ to a Sunfire amp?"I'm not sure if you're looking for a stereo amp or a pair of mono-blocks.But for stereo amps... | |
| Class D = Trash? George,You stated: "All your doing at the moment is trying to protecting your investment so it won’t take a monitory nose dive when this new technology becomes mainstream and finally puts Class-D into the hi-end Audio bracket, with today’s gr... | |
| Class D = Trash? Hi George, I think you're seriously under-estimating the performance of the many current good class D amps using switching frequencies around 5oo kHz. I say this based on my personal experiences with 3 different class D amps over the past 3 ... | |
| Class D = Trash? Hi George, You asked:"why do you think Technics have gone to the trouble to advance the class!"? Most likely to sell them at $30k each to gullible buyers. that believe higher switching frequencies amps actually sound better than the $630-$3,0... | |
| Class D = Trash? Hi George, From my technically limited layman’ s perspective, the quote you posted from Optoma USA actually seemed logical and made some sense to me. If I didn’t know better from years of personal experience, I’d probably just accept what they sta... | |
| Class D = Trash? atmasphere, Thank you for replying to my questions. Your confirmation that current class D amp switching frequencies are not causing 'inharmonic distortion', along with class D Ice and Hypex NCore power module inventor Bruno Putzeys' state... | |
| Class D = Trash? randy-11, You stated:"of course, you can measure all sorts of distortion products - inharmonic means non-harmonic." Well golly gee, Randy, I would have never thought that 'inharmonic' means the same as 'non-harmonic'. Of course they mean t... | |
| Class D = Trash? Hi atmasphere, Thank you for your explanation. I know your credentials and trust your comments have no hidden agenda. Unfortunately, I don't know georgehifi's credentials and whether he has a hidden agenda against class D. Okay, so you'r... | |
| Class D = Trash? georgehifi, Let me get this straight: When I initially asked you:"1. Does any scientific evidence exist that in any way supports your theory that the current class D switching frequencies are too low and result in sonic anomalies that are... | |
| Class D = Trash? georgehifi, I never set out to write long winded posts but I admit they tend to be overly verbose. I’m going to strive for more brevity starting now. Your last post goes over information already discussed on this thread.and totally avoids answerin... |