taras22
Responses from taras22
| Doug Schroeder Method, Double ic Yes....and this change really improves on the first splitter based model.... | |
| The Science of Cables Not much of a stretch to say that functionally the cable haters/deniers club are saying much the same thing..."After all many people consider the whole cable pursuit unworthy because for them, the result isn't worth the cost"....or maybe the idea ... | |
| The Science of Cables @glupson Cables may be dismissed as being capable of significant differences because they are, in essence and not in some very complicated "flowing lava"-kind of example, simple. At least in the minds of those suspicious ones. Well, a few thi... | |
| The Science of Cables It wasn't. | |
| The Science of Cables Yup | |
| The Science of Cables Nice strategic retreat there...nothing worse than a mob of ravenous lawyers on your tail eh ?....and yes I amscrayed too.... | |
| The Science of Cables Good point...but caveatically only if the cable strictly conforms to the established LCR standards ?....cause all that other weird stuff is not theoretically robust enough ?....which hopefully means we, as purveyors of really weird cable, will not... | |
| The Science of Cables What can I say, you’re Brilliant.....I’ve always said that....and incidentally just like your rocks, whose operating principle btw was used in a product that actually won an Oscar for technical achievement way back when... | |
| The Science of Cables @glupson So let me get this straight, cables are generally dismissed because they are perceived to produce only incremental differences across brands, and any differences are written off as just more marketing hyperbole that can’t be believed.But ... | |
| The Science of Cables @geoffkait No, worries, you weren’t my intended target Its all OK I was feeling guilty anyway. | |
| The Science of Cables @glupson So far, jhills is in the lead. Wow, being in the lead in what is this thread’s equivalent of a Miss Congeniality contest is really not such a big whoop eh. But then I suppose given the way your team has been trashed wholesale here any win... | |
| The Science of Cables @geoffkait Buzz kill. Much sorries for whatever I did to throw such a pall across this august thread. I will from this point on dedicate my life to making sure I never ever do that again. Be aware that as I type this I am shaking at the thought... | |
| The Science of Cables @elizabeth You go on like you found THE ONE TRUE WHATEVER Well, he is talking about an idea that produces the most dramatic difference I have ever heard in the audio cables category. And which btw is definitely in the running, and may well be t... | |
| The Science of Cables @rodman99999 Thank you for posting those links....and for those genuinely interested you may want to follow up on the phonon reference ( its role in electrical conductivity is pretty fascinating stuff....). | |
| The Science of Cables @celanderMost excellent point. So as long as that is agreed-upon we can move on. |