Stringreen,
This seemed to be the crux of the question posed by Eriksdad:
How is this odd?
This seemed to be the crux of the question posed by Eriksdad:
It looks cool but it appears complicated to set up and useI responded that I had no issues with the set up.
The Dynavector 505 is not more complicated to set up than other high quality tonearms. I owned a 505 some years back and had no issues with it other than it's unusual appearance and massive overall weight. The overall weight could be a problem for some "sprung" turntables.The second part of Eriksdad question was:
.....Any opinions about the Dynavector arm would be appreciated.To which I responded
problem with the Dynavector is the short (vertical axis) tonearm which is especially sensitive to VTA and record warp due to it's ultra short length. The plus side of the Dynavector is the high mass arm for the horizontal plane, which provides very robust bass with most cartridges I've paired with it.I addressed the issue of set up, followed by opinion's (both positive and negative) of the 505's unusual design.
How is this odd?