Yes, maybe some manufacturers/audiophiles/reviewers think is a solved one when ( IMHO ) certainly it's not, a mistake or a wrong way to think about: but why? because no one ask it? or because ignorance?
R.
R.
Telarc 1812 revisited
Why in October 2013 after so many many years of analog audio are we discussing...Where is this we? Who's discussing? The latest 25 posts are but vain soliloquoy. This thread might cautiously ask of itself, "To be, or not to be?" Lest some player recklessly declaim, "If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well it were done quickly." ;-) |
This one is a forgotten classic and features spoken commentary explaining how the actual ordinance used was set up and recorded. I suppose people actually cared about such things in their recordings back in this one's day (1958 I believe). Vinyl was the actual target medium to show of back in 1958 with the MLP. It's also included in the MLP CD box set, volume 1, which is the copy I own. |
Dear Dougdeacon: Well there are at least two gentlemans that really cares about: J.Carr and T.wynsc. and you can read their posts. Now, I would like and appreciated that more than put in evidence that " vain soliloquoy " ( that IMHO does not apport nothing to the whole subject ( as the Dover posts. ) ) and due to your recognized knowledge level try to post something that could be useful about, you are way better than all that. In the other side you are following the thread, well try to follow it in a more positive sense. Waiting for your contribution. Regards and enjoy the music, R. |