Now we await the deluge of "why do you bother' or "they are so arrogant" or "call the administrators" or well, you get the drift.
Cheers
Cheers
Jazz for aficionados
Frogman, as far as I am concerned; and I don't mean for it to be offensive, but it's real. I preface this statement with the big "I", meaning one person, and one person only. With all the musical knowledge you and Learsfool have combined, if you can not put it together to make a sound equivalent to this, it's moot. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bzgyO6ndjo Now I know Learsfool is going to tell me he's got students who can produce music equivalent to this, so I'll excuse him. The bottom line is the music, not the nuts and bolts. Enjoy the music. |
Hard feelings? No way. You are a treasure on this thread. A man who truly knows and loves music, and wants to share that with others. Where would we be without you. But, Fusion still sucks, unless, it's not considered Jazz, then it's just another genre. The reason? It's not a natural progression of Jazz. It's creation had more to do with the amount of money being made by Rock groups on tour, versus the amount of money being made by Jazz players, esp as the popularity of Jazz declined. Like the Frankenstein of music. Rock damaged or destroyed a lot. Jazz, Rock&Roll, Soul, R&B, Country. Criminal. Cheers |
O-10, like you, I don't mean this to be offensive. If you want an honest answer, please try again because I have no idea what it is your asking. I hope it's not what it appears you're asking, because if it is, it is one of the most nonsensical things I have ever read. Equivalent to: what on earth does that mean? |