stereo receiver recommendations


Hi folks,

A friend recently got me interested in this hobby, but I'm definitely still a newbie without much real world listening experience. A colleague at work knows I'm interested in audio and came to me for advice to replace a broken stereo receiver. Problematically, she was fairly coy about budget, so a few recommendations would be greatly appreciated... Lets go with <$500, $500-600, & <$1000 as the 3 price ranges.

She definitely wants to have a phono input for a connected turntable and to have a FM tuner built in so unfortunately we're stuck with stereo receivers rather than integrated amps, which drastically limits the options. She also definitely wants to buy new. She didn't know the model of speakers so I'm not talking about a serious audiophile but rather someone who just enjoys having music playing in her home and doesnt want to give up local radio or her vinyl collection. For that reason I'm thinking ease of use, functionality, and reliability are probably just as important as sound quality (I hope that doesnt make too many of you cringe), but I still want it to sound good. Searching through musicdirect & crutchfield, I've come up with the following:

<$500: Cambridge SR10 or Yamaha R-N303
$500-600: Cambridge SR20 or Yamaha R-N602 
<$1000: Outlaw RR2160 or Yamaha R-N803

Would love input from people with experience with any of these products or recommendations about something else that might be better. Any problems any of you have found with any of the above models? Anybody experienced both in a particular price range and found one to sound particularly better? 

Thanks!
ethos123
Isn’t the Luxman R117 one of the most legendary receivers in audiophile circles? I mean for receivers, I think this thing is the holy grail for an integrated device. Have I owned one? No. But you can easily find tons of positive reviews on this forum for the Lux. And it has a ton of inputs, one of which is a phono stage. They cost a few bucks new and most were owned by picky owners so they seem to be well cared for and can be had for a low price on the used market. I swear I heard someone call this thing the McIntosh of receivers :) I have owned two high end Yamaha receivers. I still use one in my kids home theater but I have to admit that the low end is just a little light and I have to compensate by gaining my powered sub a little more than necessary. My ancient/vintage Pioneer SX class receiver always had warmth on the low end that these newer units seem to lack. It seems to me she would be delighted with a lower cost receiver and higher priced speakers, if she can swing it.
I definitely would say the R-117 is legendary.  It is one special piece that came along after the 70's receiver wars.  Not the most beautiful looking, somewhat industrial in appearance, but the sound sure is beautiful.  I kick myself every time I think about that I sold mine.  I was about as close to "minty" as you can get without it being in a sealed box.

Bill
Ethos :  consider the PS audio Sprout.  It has phono but does not have FM tuner.  Personally, I don’t see the need for an FM  tuner anymore although surely others have an opinion on this.  I’m sure your friend had a cell phone (can connect via Bluetooth) and a computer (usb) and get her radio stations online.  ~$500.  
   Shoff
do not be afraid of the Luxman R-117 because it is not new technology.  Do some research and read the reviews.  This is one of the best receivers of all time!


Willand
I definitely would say the R-117 is legendary.

I had the Luxman R-115  It replaced a Harmon Kardon 730  (45 wpc) which had lost the left channel. I listened to the Lux in the showroom. However when I brought it home and hooked it to my large original advents, I was sorely disappointed. There was no bass line...., only a thump for the bass drum. I was happy to sell the Lux and get my HK repaired. Maybe the 117 was a different animal. But Lux had 3 receivers on the Mkt which doubled in wattage as you went up the line. IIRC, the R113 was 35 wpc, the R115 was 70 wpc and the R117 was 140 wpc, all solid state. I've heard others praise the R117. But the 115 was not very good at all IMO. FWIW, I tried Infinity 5000 (?) with the Lux also. Same result. No bass line. So i'm always surprised to see great reviews of the Luxman R series of receivers.
@artemus_5 

Most of my experience with the Luxman receivers(R-115, R-117) has been with Klipsch Heresy I's, Heresy II's, Fortes and Quartets.  All a minimum of 96dB efficient and easy to drive with no stress or strain on the Luxmans.  Most experience also has been in a 13' x 13' x 10' room and well damped.  All these factors I am sure have contributed to my fondness of these Luxmans.

Bill