Interconnects and non-believers


For anyone who denies there are differences in cables, I have news for you.
There are vast differences.  I just switched interconnects between my CD transport (Cyrus) and DAC (Schiit Gumby), and the result was transformational.  Every possible parameter was improved: better definition, better soundstaging,  better bass, better depth etc.
I can’t understand how any audiophile with ears can deny the differences.  Is it delusion or dogma?
128x128rvpiano
Given:

Difference in sound - SS  vs. Tube
Difference in sound - between tubes of the same type e.g. 6SN7/5692
Difference in sound - between different power tubes e.g. EL84, KT88, 300B.

Personal preference in speaker sound/choice.  
Difference in sound - Vinyl vs Digital

Etcetera, etcetera, etcetera 

The science notwithstanding; is it not possible for one to hear differences in interconnects? 
Just a generalization; if your amp is solid state and constructed of select parts, the power cord will make a larger relative difference than the other cables. If your amp is tubed and made from top tier parts, the IC between preamp and amp will make the most relative difference, with speaker cables a close second.
With the resurgence of integrated amplifiers, I'm sure there's an after market for high-end wires connecting the pre to power stages...
@prof
Yeah, speaker break in seems a lot more plausible to me.

I’m not sure though about the magnitude of the effects. I never noticed speaker break in on any speaker I’ve owned, (and I’m a careful listener) so I just have to infer what I can from outside information.
It simply means that you can’t hear it..

and thinking that others could not hear it... is a sin of thinking that your hearing is as good as anyone else’s... or that their hearing is not better than yours or better trained than yours.

A sin of logic omission combined with projection.

You are very smooth with your straw man projections, very nicely couched.

But make no mistake, they are still straw man projections, moments of pronounced airs of superiority in their undercurrent. The kind of subtleties that make it very obvious that you know something, at the very least, about couching speech in terms that are missed by most.. as being the linguistic subtleties that they really are -which is ’manipulative techniques’ in literary expression. Some might call it Machiavellian, even.

In some circles it’s called ’neuro linguistic programming’. You keep committing logical fallacies that are long tailed in written scope, where it takes more than a single point in analysis or thought for some to see.
Drat.

Here I was trying to crash the Golden Ears party and Teo The Bouncer won't let me in!  I've been found out!

Whatever am I going to do with the rest of my night now?  I hear Bose is throwing a party, maybe they'll let me in...
;)