Monitor Audio Pl 300ii vs. KEF Reference 5


I own the KEF Reference 5s.  I borrowed the Monitor Audio Pl300 ii speakers for comparison, which is still under way.  Thoughts so far:  Both are good speakers.  The KEFs provide a lot of detail.  Listening to classical music, you can hear orchestral instruments and sections pretty clearly.  Background and counter melodies can be identified. Piano music is very realistic.  The MAs do not provide as much instrumental detail but they do have a more mellow, deeper, broader sound.  Which is better is really a matter of personal choice.  As I said, I’m still listening so these are some quick preliminary reactions.  More later.  
fast
bo1972,

Please don't start, because with all of your hyperbole the conversation becomes about you. That being said, there are many people that feel Monitor Audio series II are too laid back and as a result aren't as detailed as some would like. 
OP - 

Can you tell us about your listening room, acoustics, and amps?

Thanks,

Erik
The AMT tweeter is a lot different than a dome tweeter. And it needs to be used different to get the full potential. We can proof and have proven that we do not have this issue that it is too dark. 

We have proven that is it more open and creates even more details than speakers with a dome tweeter. The problem is that people do not understand sound and music either.

They all do audio by trial and error. Selecting audio this will never make yolu understand what you are doing. You need to understand the properties of sound first before you can understand audio.

We will place many reviews of clients who went from a trial and error system to a Tru-Fi system. We will translate all the reviews in english as well. 

In a Tru-Fi system the Platinum II series is a titally different loudspeaker than peolle know it for the trial and error world. Our clients will tell this in their reviews. 

When I see the systems used for Platinum II reviews I can see the mistakes they made. Regarding the high frequencies they all make simmilar mistakes.
Never mind bo. You say the same things over and over and over and over and over again. 
People are always talking about brands and products. In the Tru-Fi world we only focus on the properties of each individual part in an audiosystem. This is a totally different way to create an audiosystem. The differences between our way and the trial and error world could not be bigger.

The results proof how superior each Tru-Fi system is. We do a lot of research all the time. And no we will never give details for free. We are now talking with different manufacturers. It is my knowledge and insight. I do not share this.

We do a lot of modifications and use many tools to limit smog, magnetism and high frequent noise. I will never share any of this information. Based on the fact that I made the leap bwteeen us and the rest a lot bigger. And I want to make this leap bigger each 2 months of mine.

When we install an audiosystem we use for far over 7000 dollar in high tech measurement tools. Most audio shops only take a few simpole and cheap tools with them. In vision we also use high tech calibration software and tools of over 7000 dollar.

The Tru-Fi world is a world what is 20 yeras ahead of the trial and error world. By doing research all the time we can make this leap bigger and bigger.

We will proof that trial and error is an important reason on facts that it is so ineffective. That is why we will share the stories of people who went from a trial and erro system to a Tru-Fi system.