This is a repeat Rok, but since we both like it I'm going to put it down;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lb8DlC3utYE
Jazz for aficionados
This is a repeat Rok, but since we both like it I'm going to put it down; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lb8DlC3utYE |
I recall, a long time ago, talking to my co-worker, a young handsome gent, who told me he met a lady from New Orleans at a party, and fell instantly in love. He was about to get married when the spell wore off, and he discovered she was uglier than "home made sin" as he put it. Was she a descendant of Marie Laveau? |
p.s. orpheus ///As you already know Rok, I detest stylists who do vocal gymnastics when they are totally uncalled for, and on the wrong song./// Hate to say that I agree. I rarely judge any pro-musician since all of them did certain amount of effort just to perform (and usually they can do much more than it seems) and I appreciate that but in this case, the vocal decoration is over-sufficient. For my taste. To say more with less...a work of art. |
Well, O-10, no sense breaking the streak; since you want to keep track. The live Sarah/“Misty” wins hands down in my book. Don’t get me wrong, she can practically do no wrong in my book, but those two renditions are practically apples/oranges. The live one is jazz trio only, and far more relaxed and evocative; much more in the spirit of jazz. The studio version...just that. Studio produced; faster, with A LOT of “sweetening”, less intimate. A bit Muzak(ish); what some refer to as elevator music. Different performance environments and as always, she knows the tape is rolling. But, who can argue with Sassy? |