You claim a new way to calculate appropriate speaker cable.
I ask you how; what's the formula?
You state a theory and refer to the evidence of the results of an impedance calculation.
I looked at your evidence and found an error in your interpretation.
You demanded evidence to support my claim that you're wrong.
I cited and linked to an article by Nelson Pass, which you read, that agreed with the claim I was making.
Repeatedly you've presented anecdotal evidence and demanded it be held to the same level of respect as actual measurements.
Now you demand I engage you on the level of anecdotal evidence as if that's equal to quantitative evidence of your quantitative claim.
Then you demand I replicate the quantitative evidence because you refuse to explain the difference between your measurements and those of Nelson Pass, which you've already looked at.
The anecdotal evidence that people say it sounds good doesn't support your scientific claim that your formula is the cause. Anecdotal evidence isn't evidence of quantitative scientific statements such as you've made. When you state you've developed a calculation, you've left the realm of the subjective and entered the objective. Therefore, subjective evidence is irrelevant.