3 things I learned from using MANY interconnect cables


At last, I am posting here for the first time! I got so much help from this forum and always felt a bit guilty about not contributing.

Over the past several years, I have used the following interconnect cables: Audioquest Golden Gate, Audioquest Columbia, Audioquest Sky, Monster Interlink 300 MkIII, Harmonic Technology Pro Silway (I have used both Mk I and Mk II), Silnote Morpheus, Anticables (the original version), Tara Labs RSC, Nordost Heimdall, Straightwire Crescendo, and Chord Anthem. They were all purchased used and I always had 2 or more pairs to compare at a given time although I didn’t have these cables all at once. Through the journey, I learned the following:

1. The price was NOT indicative of the sound quality unless you go very cheap (less than $100). I think this point is self-explanatory so I am not adding any elaboration.

2. Disconnecting and re-connecting the cables had a very positive impact on sound quality, which will affect any AB comparison. If you are comparing two pairs of cables that had comparable sound quality, the new cables will sound better because the connection would be fresh.

3. In my experience, the cables were NOT system dependent. This might raise some eye brows as it goes against the commonly held belief so I am going to explain a bit here.

All I am saying is that I have never seen a case where my preference order of two sets of interconnect cables got reversed when tested on two or more components (e.g. cable A was better than cable B on amp X but cable B was better on amp Y, etc). With any AB comparison I ever did, the better cable always won no matter what component I was testing them on.

Oh in case someone is curious, the best pair of interconnect cables I have ever used was Chord Anthem. It had a wider frequency range and a more natural tonality than others. And I would rather not add the qualification "but it was the best only in my system" because of the 3rd point I made above. Cheers!
johnson0134
Three things I have learned reading threads about wires on audiophile forums....    
#1 People really believe what they discovered that works in their system, means something for all other possible systems.     
#2 Some readers believe anything, acting like deer in the headlights of a car speeding toward them....At least they write that way.. (Do not know if they follow through)      
#3 and a perennial favorite.. Some folks cannot resist, no matter what, naming their OWN favorite be all end all cable that is infinitely better than the cable expounded on by the op of the thread.   
Please consider these words as 'sarcasm, or fun or a joke', or to be ignored by the serious folks among us.
I would be interested in an overall top five list of cables, and a separate top five list of cost-effective cables.   Thank you in advance for your efforts. 
jcder sez: ""I would be interested in an overall top five list of cables, and a separate top five list of cost-effective cables.  Thank you in advance for your efforts. ""
Sadly there is no real top five either way, there may be a most purchased by the most people who KEPT those cables... (vs owning then selling them for the next one they hope will do the job.) But since every system is different, of different bits, different speakers, different rooms and different personal needs of the listener... There can be no universal solution.  
If anyone asks me, I say stick to the major brands for the least headaches. KImber, Cardas, AudioQuest.
Sometimes, the pseudo-science  on these forums is astounding ...

"It had a wider frequency range..." Really? What exactly do you mean by this? Did you measure it using appropriate technology? Is a wider(r) frequency range actually a good thing?

See: http://www.hi-fiworld.co.uk/amplifiers/75-amp-tests/147-frequency-response.html


Dont rule out Blue Jeans which is Belden, which is what by far most recording studios are using to get the music onto the recording medium to begin with.