abbey road question


does the newly re-issued vinyl abbey road sound much better than the half speed mastered mfsl from the 80's? My mfsl copy sounds like its under water for the first few songs-thanks.
remains8
Czarivey
I prefer early pressings in poor condition.
Surface noise with clicks and pops makes this record less boring.

I have a friend named Louis and his chocolate lab is named Abby.

One music night Louis and Abby walked in and Abby was very excited so I ask,

"Did Abby drive?" Another member responded,

"No...... Lewis drove and Abby rode"
I hear ya...nothing like a worn, crappy, noise-ridden copy of AR to liven up the day...oye vey.
I have many digital copies of Abby Road and one is the MFSL and like the above post, I think it has too much bass. My guess is the latest vinyl is a digital mix to vinyl. I've listened to at well used copy from the very early 70's AR and the 1987 compact disc sounds better to me. I have a bootleg digital copy of AR called "Millennium Red Collection" and it sounds the best of all the copies I have collected.
I heard the same thick and dull sound when I compared the two pressings, and with the gain much lower on the Mofi.
Not to start a fight but, It the LP comes from digital how can it really be analog? I mean isn't a recording originally put on a master TAPE then pressed to vinyl what the big deal is about vinyl? I mean I love vinyl and have many records but once digital, always digital, right?