Get Stoned

As for me, I do think footers can make a difference to sonics, especially as regards turntables, maybe not so much as regards something like an SDS, but I am just wondering specifically about the Terrastones. For example, there are dozens of variations on the original "tiptoe"; why would any one of them "sound" different from any other of them? Materials used in construction might make one different from another, but I would have to hear it to believe it. I gather that the Terrastone is not a conical type footer. (Guess I should Google the item.)

I replaced the stock VPI feet on my Classic with the Bearpaws and I do like the improvement so I would not question a further improvement with the Terrastones under a turntable. However, Terrastones under the SDS, which simply regulates the power supply, pose an entirely different reference. I'd like to hear any theory under which this makes sense.

Theory Schmeory.....I know what I hear. All you need to do is get them and try them for yourself. They have a money back guarantee....Edansound.com

No, it's cool, but I need at least some plausible explanation why this should make a difference. Otherwise, I'll just attribute it to your subjective perception and pass. I believe any effort at improving the sound of one's system with auxiliaries might be psychologically destined to result in a positive, but ultimately very subjective, perception of sonic benefits.

Stringreen,

It took me awhile to find the site with data on Terrastones. I wanted to take a look at them.

The problem was, the company name is spelled Edensound, not Edansound as posted.

http://edensoundaudio.com/index.html