too much analysis leads to paralysis.
the placebo effect is alive and well.
what difference does it make if powercords make a difference in sound or they don't make any difference in sound.
there is no way to prove, using analytic a priori deductive methods.
so any empirical proof would be based upon statistics or induction.
it has been suggested that a blind test be used to test for differences in the "sound" of power cords.
blind tests do not prove anything.
any statement based upon perception is essentially probabilistic, hence does not prove anything.
all of the efforts to justify that power cords differ in their affect upon a stereo system amount to a philosophical discussion, with no conclusion.
the senses are unreliable.
the only way to deal with this issue is a mathematical proof.
the placebo effect is alive and well.
what difference does it make if powercords make a difference in sound or they don't make any difference in sound.
there is no way to prove, using analytic a priori deductive methods.
so any empirical proof would be based upon statistics or induction.
it has been suggested that a blind test be used to test for differences in the "sound" of power cords.
blind tests do not prove anything.
any statement based upon perception is essentially probabilistic, hence does not prove anything.
all of the efforts to justify that power cords differ in their affect upon a stereo system amount to a philosophical discussion, with no conclusion.
the senses are unreliable.
the only way to deal with this issue is a mathematical proof.