Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved


Unable to respond to, "Mach2Music and Amarra: Huge Disappointment"- Thread. Other Members take free pop-shots!
Apparently some have more Freedom Of Speech than others! I
don't know how many times I have said it, I want Computer
Audio to succeed! It will only succeed if Computers are designed from the ground up to reproduce Music (Same minimum standard applied for Equipment of ALL Audio Formats)! This is common sense Audio Engineering Design. Bandaid Modifications cannot be substituted for absence in design to produce Music! Design it right to EARN the right to become a New Audio Format- same as all other Audio Formats! No Freebee's, No Cutting Corners! Lack of design is what's causing such varied results in S.Q. between
listeners of Computer Audio. I see about 50% negative
responses here on these Threads. It will continue to happen unless you fix it! Blaming me won't help! I am an
Engineer, and I can read results! 50/50 success/ failure
rate- you have an inherit Engineering Design Flaw for the
reproduction of Music via Computers! Shock! Suprise- since
they were never designed for Music! So when is someone finally going to properly design the Equipment/Computer
(From the ground up) for Computer Audio? Do we continue
to treat any real criticism as "HERESY" in the lack of
design in Computer Audio for Music? You tell me what I am
allowed to talk about, and we will both know!
pettyofficer
Petty, therein lies one of the big advantages of computer audio - it can be a direct replacement for CDs as well as a high resolution medium. No need to replace your CD collection if computer audio does take hold - just rip your CDs to your hard drive while simultaneously enjoying the option of higher-than-CD resolution. You can have your cake and eat it too.

Again, nobody is "pulling the plug" on any other format. No matter what you or I say, the only way that happens is through market forces. I don't want any format to be wiped out any more than you do - but if computer audio renders CD redundant in the eyes of consumers it will become obsolete.
No sense making something obsolete that doesn't require-
Wasapi, Kernel Streaming, ASIO, That is not subject to
Computer Virus, That is not subject to fragmentation, That
is not subject to Hard Drive Crash, That is not subject to
Back-up Hard Drive Crash, That is not subject to powerful
magnets wiping out memory, That doesn't put your entire
vulnerable Music Collection in one place (Eggs in one basket), That is not subject to Hard Drive Errors...etc...
etc...etc. An extra 5th Wheel? Try an extra 20 Wheel
conglomeration! Compared to that, something that gets by
on four Wheels (CD) is hardly obsolete. Compared to CD,
Computer Audio looks like an Audio Format built by
Committee. It requires massive amounts of redundant steps
easily bypassed with CD. You also don't have to search for Meta Data either. Computer Audio is an Audio Format that is
done the "HARD WAY"! Hardly conductive to relaxation with
Music. I mean waiting three hours to Download High Rez.
Music Files....pop a Disk in a machine and you are done!
No Software, no headaches...just "MUSIC"! If Music is not the point, then what is?
Petty,

What kind of stereo do you have in that bunker that I know you must have just in case the big one drops?

If it does please save some room for me. I do not have a bunker much less a stereo in it.
Just in case the Big One drops? You mean "SKYNET", the same
loving source for your Computer Audio? I thought that was
just a story! If you are driving a V.W. Bug with 20 Wheels
on it, with a Transmission that has 200 redundant gears,
please drop a big one on that Committee designed monstrosity! Just want to play some Music here, not go to the Moon Mr. Chairman of the Rocket Science Committee.
Computer Audio is going to end up on the same Scrap Heap as the Space Shuttle. The Scrap Heap of obsolete, too many
redundant moving parts, costs way more than you will ever get out of it, Boondoggle. Computer Audio, a Swiss Army
Knife with a Sink- and Sauna attached to it??? What the hell is this for a simple Audio Format? Heaven forbid if
you ever redesigned a Saxaphone- or any other Musical
Instrument! It would require Wasapi, and Kernel Streaming as well- and replace all other Saxaphones. Heaven help us!
Don't you dare touch our Musical Instruments next with your Rocket Science Committee Computer Audio Design
mentality! You are starting to scare the hell out me, and
making that Bunker look a little better! You are more dangerous than the Big One. Is this Nerd Gothic Computer
obsession, or what? Do you also want to create a hundred
redundant steps for me to put on my pants as well? Get yer greedy paws off of my Pants- same for my CDs! Plug
and Play CD doesn't require any "Computer Magic", therefore
it wont waste your time with silly gimmicks- just Music.
You also wont be wasting your time having to design your
Music Storage (Software, Metadata, Music File Format...etc)
from scratch. You already have that in the palm of your
hand- it is called a Shortcut around all of the Computer
Garbage. You know it as a CD. Spend more time listening to
Music, that is it's purpose after all- not trying to decypher the "Matrix".
Hmmmmm...that's strange...most of us don't find it THAT difficult to back up our music collections for safety's sake. It's not THAT difficult! And most of us can somehow do the research and implement a computer audio system that at least equals if not exceeds competitively priced CDPs

But...after all this I guess you're right Pettyofficer, computer audio is just too challenging FOR YOU. Nobody is stopping you from NOT adopting it and using your CDP. We just want you to stop complaining about YOUR problems as if they're OURS - we've actually figured it all out - and we'd be happy to share it with you if you would just listen for once.

No need for you to worry about those of us who have had success with what you find so confusing. By and large we're quite happy with what we're hearing, thank you very much!