Behringer DEQ2496 - worth using in hi-end system?

I've decided to give the Behringer DEQ2496 a try. It will be necessary to install the unit in my tape loop, so I'm ordering adapters.

What do you owners recommend for interconnects? I'm more likely to purchase something neutral in tone and reasonably priced...not my usual Purist Audio stuff.

Also, I presently use my tape loop output for another purpose. Does the Behringer have a second set of outputs that I can use ? All I saw in a photo were phono jacks. Do I have to purchase Male Phono/Female RCA adapters? If so, from where?

Finally, the best price I've found is $299 on Zzounds.com, or Musiciansfriend.com. Any better sources?

06-11-06: Drubin
You might want to try using it between transport and DAC. Actually, I know you can't do that, Grant, so use it between transport and preamp.

What are the benefits of this method over the tape loop method, other than freeing up the preamp's tape loop for another purpose? I was thinking the tape loop method offered the flexibility to completely bypass the EQ if I so choose. Placing it between the CDP and preamp does not offer this as the signal still runs through some EQ circuitry even if the bypass switch is engaged, correct?

Also, placing the EQ between CDP and preamp dedicates the EQ to just the CDP, and my other sources do not benefit from the DEQ2496.

Yes, Dan, but I do not own a transport and DAC. I own a Denon 3910 with balanced analog outputs. Therefore, whether I place the EQ between the Denon and preamp, or in the preamp's tape loop, I will still be required to utilize the Behringer's analog XLR inputs and outputs.

For those who own transport/DAC combos, I can see the advantage of keeping the signal processing in the digital domain.

06-11-06: Drubin
I understand. If the Denon has a digital out, you might want to try that at some point, just to see if it makes a difference.

It does and I might try it, but doing so would completely bypass the Exemplar tubed output stage...and what would be the point? Kind of like bypassing the APL circuitry. Might as well own a stock Denon, but never say never, and your point is taken.

I take it you use the digital output/inputs. What cables do you use?

My preference for one-box solutions derives from space issues. I simply don't have room for an additional box. I realize I'm in the minority, and most audiophiles do what's necessary to accommodate however many boxes are needed for their systems.

refinement is all what this hobby about.
Dmitrydr (System | Threads | Answers)

Enjoying music is what the hobby is about to me. I no longer give a damn about refinement.

In fact, the more refined my system has become, the less I have enjoyed it.

Dan, more refinement leads to placing my focus on the equipment...on the minutea in the sound...and to general dissatisfaction as 95% of the sound is perfect, except for That One Thing.

I am slowly coming about, and considering setting a new course for less resolution, less detail...and less focus on the gear.

I realized tonight that I can take a digital ouput via toslink from my old but trusty Sony CDP77ES changer and input the signal to the Behringer's DAC. I can do an easy A/B comparison between the Behringer's output and the Sony's analog output. This should be fun to try.

I had been all fired up to buy a Monarchy M24 tube DAC, but I think I'll slow down just a bit and test out the Behringer first.

One interesting comment made by CC Poon of Monarchy was his suggestion of using the Monarchy DIP jitter reducing unit in conjunction with the Monarchy M24. I see that Behringer has a similar unit...the SRC2496...for about half the cost of the Monarchy DIP. Has anyone any experience with one of these reclocking units? Do they provide an audible benefit?

One interesting comment made by CC Poon of Monarchy was his suggestion of using the Monarchy DIP jitter reducing unit in conjunction with the Monarchy M24.

Couldn't edit my post.

CC Poon suggested the use of the Monarchy DIP Upsampler, not the Monarchy DIP. They are different units, and I just wanted to clarify.