Integrated amp recommendation around 3k (I need more power!)
Hi everyone,
Yep, another of those "which amp would you recommend" questions. My system is settling in very nicely recently. I've bounced around with speakers quite a bit, but I keep returning to little Harbeth P3esr. They fit my room well and sound beautiful. However, they have a sensitivity of only 83db. Right now, my system is comprised of the following: VPI Traveler Turntable w/Clearaudio Maestro V2 cartridge, Croft RIAA phono stage, and the LFD LE V integrated. As nice as the LFD is sonically, it just falls a bit short on power 65wpc into 8ohms) with the little Harbeths.
So, I'm looking to move to a more powerful integrated amp. I'm certainly not a headbanger (or I'd have different speakers), but I would like to have ample headroom and current to maximize the P3s. I'm looking at a budget of around $3k, used or new. As I have an all analog 2-channel rig, I don't need a DAC, subwoofer outs, tone controls, balance, etc. Heck, don't even care about a remote. Just good, clean, dynamic power.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated - thanks!
Best, Scott
Yep, another of those "which amp would you recommend" questions. My system is settling in very nicely recently. I've bounced around with speakers quite a bit, but I keep returning to little Harbeth P3esr. They fit my room well and sound beautiful. However, they have a sensitivity of only 83db. Right now, my system is comprised of the following: VPI Traveler Turntable w/Clearaudio Maestro V2 cartridge, Croft RIAA phono stage, and the LFD LE V integrated. As nice as the LFD is sonically, it just falls a bit short on power 65wpc into 8ohms) with the little Harbeths.
So, I'm looking to move to a more powerful integrated amp. I'm certainly not a headbanger (or I'd have different speakers), but I would like to have ample headroom and current to maximize the P3s. I'm looking at a budget of around $3k, used or new. As I have an all analog 2-channel rig, I don't need a DAC, subwoofer outs, tone controls, balance, etc. Heck, don't even care about a remote. Just good, clean, dynamic power.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated - thanks!
Best, Scott
59 responses Add your response
I have a Musical Fidelity big one. My memory is shot; it has around 300 watts ,more at low impedance' They have a later one which had even more power. Sound is REALLY GOOD and used is within your budget. You can even split it and use the pre and amp sections separately. I did and both were good. the build quality is exceptional. |
Hi Scott, The specified sensitivity of the Croft phono stage (2 mv in for 0.5V out) corresponds to 48 db of gain, which is quite high for a phono stage that is suitable for use with MM cartridges. There are a few that provide higher gain, such as some of the models from RCM of Poland, but the choice of such models would be very limited and may not be within your price range. A 3 db difference in amp gain won’t amount to much in terms of the volume control positions you would find yourself using. Take a look at this photo of the front panel of a Music First passive preamp. The markings adjacent to the control appear to represent db of attenuation, and I believe are roughly representative in that respect of most rotary volume controls. For a given listening level, adding a given number of db of gain would lower the setting of the volume control that would be used by that same number of db. The bottom line would seem to me to be that if you don’t ever find yourself wanting to turn the volume control past the top of its range, and if you are happy with the Majestic in all other respects, there’s probably nothing wrong with leaving things as they are. In fact some would argue that using volume control settings near the top of the range is generally preferably to using lower settings, as it might reduce whatever sonic effects may be introduced by the volume control mechanism itself. Best regards, -- Al |
@almarg - (and anyone else who wants to chime in) Just wanted to follow up on the question of gain, as I'm a bit confused by the whole gain structure of my set up and how much gain I should be looking for in an integrated amp. I did find the Wells to provide a little less gain than I would have liked. I have some general questions about the issue: -How much more gain (above the 30db) would make a significant difference? For example, I see the Creek 100A has a gain spec of just over 33. Is that enough to matter. -Would a higher gain preamp/power amp combo give me more options to address the issue? -Is the Croft phono stage contributing to the problem? Would a different phono stage with different specs help the matter? Thanks for any thought you all might have. Best, Scott |
Just as a follow up- the Majestic arrived today, and apart from the odd feature that you can't turn it on without the remote, it is a beautiful piece in every respect - visually and sonically. I'm sure it will sound even better after it's powered up for a few days, but even right out of the box it sounds great. The gain is more than sufficient with my Croft phono stage. Looking forward to some long listening sessions over the next few days... Thanks again to everyone for their input! Best, Scott |
@erndog - definitely - will have you over for some listening once I get it all dialed in. @almarg - hadn't even thought about the issue you raise. I don't often see gain specs for an integrated amp, so it didn't cross my mind. With the LFD I didn't listen above 12 o'clock, but that wasn't due to volume. Rather, the sound started to deteriorate (clipping, I guess) beyond that. However, 12:00 was a reasonable volume level, so I'm hoping that the Wells will not be a problem. Fingers crossed... Scott |
Hi Scott, Glad I was helpful on the load capacitance/phono cable issue. Best of luck with the new amp. A question, though. I see that the Wells Audio Majestic has a specified gain of 30 db, which is on the low side for an integrated amp. A gain spec or measurement doesn’t seem to be available for your present LFD amp, but I would suspect that it is somewhat higher. Therefore you’ll probably find yourself setting the volume control on the new amp to a somewhat higher position than you have been using on the LFD. If with the LFD amp you don’t find yourself using settings above say 2 o’clock or so when you are listening with your Croft phono stage I’d feel pretty certain that there won’t be a problem. (And there certainly won’t be a problem with digital sources). But if you’ve used settings at 3 o’clock or more I’d have some concern. Best regards, -- Al |
I'll definitely update you all as I start to break it in. My system consists of the following: Components: VPI Traveler Turntable w/Clearaudio Maestro V2 cartridge Croft RIAA Phono Stage w/Tung Sol gold pin tubes Harbeth P3esr speakers Cabling, Power, Etc.: Furutech AG-12 phono cable Triode Wire Labs interconnect and power cables (10+ and 7+) JW Audio speaker cables SuperWiremold Deep-Cryo 9 outlet Power Strip Maestro wall outlet Rollerblock Jr. footers Best, Scott |
Hi everyone, I appreciate all the feedback and the recommendations. I finally made a choice, and went with the Wells Audio Majestic integrated amp - 150wpc, looks great, has excellent reviews, and a good company behind it. I will keep you all posted on how it sounds, and thanks again for all the food for thought. Best, Scott |
OP here just providing an update: I was particularly interested in Al's comments about the recommended capacitance for the cartridge and the impact a phono cable's capacitance might have on the ultimate performance of the system. I have made a few cable changes that have significantly improved the performance of my rig. I replaced my relatively modest power cables to the phono amp and integrated with Triode Wire Labs 10+ and 7+ respectively. This added an openness and bass depth that was previously lacking. However, the biggest change was to add a Furutech AG-12 phono cable. Right out of the box the treble was cleaner and more extended and the sound stage improved considerably. The system also seemed louder. After a couple of days of burn-in, I am getting far better dynamics, overall clarity, and bass response. It sounds much better at lower volumes, and I don't feel like something is missing. Most importantly, the last couple of days I have wanted to come home and listen to music rather than troubleshoot my rig. Thanks! Scott |
I use the Luxman 505ux with my SHL5s and I'm very, very happy. I've tried an Ayre AX-7E, a Rogue Cronus Magnum (bought both of these and listened for extended period) and demoed an Audio Research VSI60 and a friend's Devialet 400. None sounded better than the Luxman. It's a great match with Harbeth and also has a fine phono section MM/MC and, heresy, a loudness control that make listening at low levels very enjoyable. You should be able to find on used on Audiogon for around $2400 in excellent condition. |
Scott, I realize you have asked smrex13, but please allow me to chime in. I have an M6Si I purchased 12/15. I am driving Golden Ear Triton One's. At the time I bought the M6Si I auditioned it against a Krell Vanguard and MA6700. Naturally cost was a factor but even that aside I prefer the Musical Fidelity. If there is anything more specific you would like to know just ask. |
@tdimler - do you mind if I ask what speakers you are driving with the M6si? What is your general perception of the amp's character? I know it has more than enough power, so my only concern is whether the sonic character would fit with my tastes (clear, no treble grain, slightly laid back). Thanks, Scott |
Thanks for all the recommendations... -The Musical Fidelity is a great suggestion that I hadn't thought about. I heard the previous generation M3i and thought it a very good piece in its price range. I also like the fact that the M6si is available through Audio Advisor, who has a generous return policy. -Luxman is definitely on my short list. I've never had the opportunity to hear one, but the reviews are very positive. -The Benchmark would take up my whole budget and I'd still need a preamp and cables, so that's a not an option for me. -Almost pulled the trigger on a CJ CA200 that was on here recently. Will keep an eye out. Thanks again - lots of food for thought! Scott |
For your speakers, at that price you are looking (3k) I would try to go power amp, not integrated, and straight for the absolutely unbeatable at such price point; Benchmark AHB2. Near perfect amp for 3k - good power, balance, tones, soundstage, bass control is amazing, & details, details, details... It is small, light, but drives anything!! Can't recommend them enough. If you really need to stay with integrated amp, i would go for Cambridge Audio latest XD amps, or better Marantz PM-14 or PM-11 |
A Primare I30 would be worthwhile taking a look at, 100 wpc,very warm tube like sound.Used you can find one for about 1500$ or so.Very nice integrated amp.You can try it for awhile,if it doesn't work out,you can always get your money back as these have a huge almost cult following.For the money,this is the best sounding integrated I have ever heard. I have one I don't use currently,but it's such a nice little piece,I would hate to see it go.Every time I hook it up ,it impresses me.good luck. PS I bought an Anthem for the ex, I hated it,she hated it,very bright,run sway. |
Thanks for all the input everyone! A few quick responses: -I had the Belles Soloist, but it was far too sensitive to power line noise and I got some interference every time a light, bathroom fan, A/C, etc. was switched on in the apartment. -If I switch speakers, it would be to the Harbeth C7. I have heard the Ryans with Parasound separates and was very impressed. However, I love the Harbeth sound, so I don't want to go down the rabbit hole of auditioning new speakers. @alextakeshi - yes, I thought 65wpc would be enough, too. Al's comments on the cartridge and cabling makes me think that perhaps the problem lies in the phono set up rather than the amp-speaker pairing. @almarg - as always, your knowledge is greatly appreciated. I think your wisdom has probably saved people a lot of money and time. Thanks again to everyone, Scott |
Scott, I am running an Odyssey amp from Klaus Bunge with my Harbeth C7's. I went through a few integrated amps (NAD Master Series, Hegel, Plinius) before I ended up with the Odyssey amp. Klaus builds some of the finest amps for the money, and it comes with a 21 year warranty. I have paired my amp with a Decware CSP3 preamp. The C7's just sing with this kit! If your integrated amp has preamp outs you might want to consider just adding the amp as an alternative to replacement. |
I would second the CJ recommendation for Harbeths......go on youtube and find a video of them driving Magnepan .7s at a show to very good levels.......another notoriously hungry speaker..... I would also suggest you look at replacing the Harbeths.....notoriously inefficient and only 50wpc power handling (program material) according to two reviews.....of course you can feed them more...... I've owned those speakers and you should look at Ryan Loudspeakers 610 which is about the same price.....86db efficient and 150w power handling.....I've heard these at RMAF and AXPONA and in a home and they will absolutely obliterate the Harbeths in every regard, especially overall musicality and they are not finicky about amplification at all..... Here they were running them with a 2K or so Musical Fidelity Integrated.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fe6WznxBdjQ Here the bigger brothers were being run from a 2500.00 Aurender 100W Integrated......I heard this in person and it was unbelievably musical..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkX7v5JeJD0 I am buying the Ryan 610s for my office system to augment my headphone rig......I'm leaning toward the Aurender Integrated or the CJ with an outboard DAC...... As far as cartridge recommendation? Ortofon Quintet Bronze if you like MC, or Ortofon 2MBlack if you prefer MM |
A possible suggestion is the Anthem 225i (250wpc 8 ohm 340wpc 4 ohm), very low noise floor. While not my normal speaker this integrated works very well with my home made Ls3/5a speakers that I made ca 1980 so it might match the Harbeths. Current speakers have 93 DB sensitivity so it seems like overkill yet it has great control of the speakers. |
I use a Rogue cronos mag (100 wpc) with Spendor S5e 's and feel it's a sweet match - more than enough power I'm quite interested in the Harbeth - sound not sure if the P3's would work in my area. 15 x 18 ft Also have a rogue Pharoah and as mentioned it is a beast . Ran Magnepan .7s with it no problems at all the Pharoah has a superb phono section ! |
Can't get a better $3000 integrated than Belles soloist 1 from Power Modules. 125w into 8 ohms of clean dynamic power with a wide deep soundstage. and has a 2000 damping factor. Beneficial for your speakers. I own one in my second system with Acoustic Zen Adagios. The Amp plays like any $5000 amp I've ever heard. David belles is going on 80 years old and has been a legend in the business for a loooooong time. Nothing touches this amp at this price. |
Hi Scott, Interesting finding. One thing that can significantly affect the tonal balance of a moving magnet cartridge in the treble region, and thereby affect soundstaging and perceived dynamics, is the load capacitance that is applied to the cartridge. And I see that the Clearaudio Maestro V2 has a recommended load capacitance of 100 pf, which is too low for many setups to even come close to achieving. (The load capacitance seen by the cartridge is the sum of the input capacitance of the phono stage and the capacitances of the phono cable, tonearm wiring, and connectors). I couldn’t find an input capacitance spec for your phono stage, or a load capacitance recommendation for the Shelter 201, and of course I don’t know what the capacitance of your phono cable and tonearm wiring would be. But if you want to change to a different moving magnet cartridge, I would suggest avoiding any having a recommended load capacitance of less than around 200 pf, or an even higher number if your phono cable is longer than say 4 or 5 feet. Also, I doubt that the difference between 3.6 mv and 4.0 mv has any significance, that being a difference of less than 1 db. However there are two different test records/standards upon which cartridge output specs can be based, which I believe can result in the outputs of cartridges having identical output specs often differing by 3 db. Which in terms of mv means that a 3.6 mv cartridge under the standard that produces a higher number would be only 3.6 x 0.707 = 2.5 mv under the other standard. So that conceivably could be a contributing factor. Good luck. Best regards, -- Al |
Thank to everyone for the recommendations. It appears that some of the problem (or perhaps all of it) is due to the cartridge. Out of curiosity, I installed an older cart I have (Shelter 201), and the soundstage came to live. It has an output of 4.0mV and the cart I'm using has a 3.6mV output. It doesn't seem like that should make too much difference, but apparently with all the other factors in the chain (low sensitivity speakers, lower powered amp) the .4mV difference is significant. Of course, the entry-level Shelter doesn't sound nearly as good as the Clearaudio Maestro V2, but at least I have direction to go. Will be posting additional questions for cart recommendations on the analog forum. Thanks again for all your input. Best, Scott |
I am driving right now harbeth shl5 with Synthesis Roma 37DC+ hybrid amp ,d class power 500w per channel+tube input stages. More volume,the more power into the sound and weight,the sound is full with wonderfull midrange.I was inspired by youtube movies of this guy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftQKhGVkdlE and bought one from Italy and it sounds very similar. |
I run a Rogue Cronus Mag w/KT120 at 100 watts with Vandersteen 2 if that isn't enough power the Rogue Pharaoh has 185 watts tube preamp section solid-state amp I have heard the Harbeths 40.2 on both great sound stage and details The Cronus is about $2500 and the Pharaoh is $3500 Rogue Audio is in PA a bunch of great guys too |
Interesting that the LFD LE V doesn’t have the current to optimally drive the P3ESR. When I used the LFD LE III to drive the Harbeth SHL5, the sound is very open and dynamic. The combination sounds a lot better than most of the amps I have tried (with the Harbeth). Having said that, you may be right about the low sensitivity of the P3ESR. At 83.5 dB it is surely on the low side compared to the SHL5 and C7ES3 which are rated at 86 dB. Also, the SHL5’s impedance is 8 ohms while the P3ESR is at 6 ohms. The Harbeth surely sounds different with different amps. A powerful amp is certainly useful if one listens at higher volume levels (especially the larger speakers SHL5 and 40.1 / 40.2). A friend who owns the 40.1 has used many amps on the speakers (he currently owns all these amps) - LFD LE III, Exposure 2010S, Leben CS600, Naim 32.5/135 monoblocks, and the Naims got the vote. As good as the Leben and LFD sounds, they lacked power, and they lacked some neutrality of the Naims. The LFD made everything sounds a bit larger than life while the Naims gave a more accurate portrayal. The LFD’s strength or appeal is its tube-like glow which gave music a nice illuminating feel. You might want to give Exposure 3010S2-D a look. |
@ stereo5 - thanks for the recommendation. The Parasound looks interesting, but it's got a lot of functions that I don't need (and would be paying for). The reviews seem good, though. With respect to the speakers, I haven't heard anything that I like nearly as much as Harbeth. I have heard the P3s with a Simaudio integrated, and they sounded far more dynamic than they do with the LFD, which is why I'm considering a different amp. Best, Scott |
The Parasound Halo Integrated is 2500.00, has 160wpc, circuits designed by John Curl, also has 40 amps of peak current. I went from a Rogue Cronus Magnum 100wpc tube integrated to the Halo integrated and couldn't be happier. I agree the limitations may be the speakers themselves. Before I change amps, I would look for a larger pair of 2 way speakers with at least a 6 1/2 inch woofer to give you a sense of bass and a richer midrange. There are a lot of 2 way stand mounted speakers in the up to 3K price range. You will get more sound improvement from changing speakers than with replacing an amp. |
P.S: I’ll add to my previous comments that if some deep bass rolloff were to occur as a result of a less than optimal impedance match between the phono stage and the amp it conceivably could actually help the speakers to sound better, by keeping signal frequencies out of the speakers that they can’t handle comfortably and can’t reproduce anyway. But IMO introducing a known inaccuracy into a system, as a means of minimizing a limitation elsewhere, is in general not a good way to go. Especially if eventual upgrade of the speakers or electronic components is a possibility. Best regards, -- Al |
You're welcome, Scott. The majority of tube-based components providing line-level outputs utilize a coupling capacitor in series with their outputs, which typically results in their output impedance being highest (within the audible frequency range) at 20 Hz. If the output impedance at that frequency is known (which will usually be the case if Stereophile has reviewed the product) a load impedance 10 or more times greater than that value will usually be safe. If as in this case only a nominal impedance is known (nominal impedances usually being specified based on a mid-range frequency such as 1 kHz), I would recommend a factor in the area of 50 to 75x. So for what is apparently the 500 ohm nominal output impedance of the Croft a load impedance of 37.5K or more would certainly seem comfortable. And at around 25K or less I would start to feel a bit uncomfortable, especially if you envision the possibility of eventually changing to speakers having significantly better deep bass extension. Best regards, -- Al |
@almarg As always, thank you for being so generous with your knowledge and for looking up the specific specs of my gear. (Maybe I should be looking at a bigger, more efficient Harbeth...). In any event, I appreciate the words of caution with the CJ. Could you give me some idea of the input impedance that would be more reasonable with the Croft? I've often heard 100/1 as a minimum ratio, so I'm assuming at least 50kohms would be a target? Thanks again! Scott |
However, it does seem that the amp runs out of steam before I’m even able to generate peaks of 80db at the listening position.Hi Scott, My suspicion is that what is mainly running out of steam is the speaker, not the amp. The speakers have specified power handling of "50 watts program." Which presumably refers to the maximum amount of power they are rated to handle on the peaks of what the designers consider to be typical musical material. And their continuous power handling capability, were it specified, would be considerably less than that. Putting more power into a speaker than it can comfortably handle will result in some combination of increased distortion and thermal compression, which among other things would result in a perception of reduced dynamics. Also, regarding the CJ integrated amp that was suggested, I would have some concern about the suitability of its 10K input impedance with the output impedance of your phono stage. I found an indication that the nominal output impedance of the phono stage may be 500 ohms. However since it is tube-based, and most likely uses a coupling capacitor at its output, its output impedance at deep bass frequencies could very conceivably rise to a few K, which would result in significant deep bass rolloff in conjunction with a 10K load. On the other hand, though, that might not be perceivable with these particular speakers, given their limited deep bass extension. But why risk compounding that limitation? Best regards, -- Al |

