MIT Love 'em or Hate 'em


Has anyone else noticed that audio stores that carry MIT think there is no better cable type and stores that don't carry MIT all think they are terrible. Is this sour grapes or is something else going on here?
bundy
Thanks Greg, If I read you right, we feel the same about the whole matter. Pity Krusty did not really want to talk.
By the way, I ask myself why this person never posted before and came on like this. Possibly he has been here before with a different name (I assume this can be done). I also think he succeeded in doing just what he set out to do, tick everyone off. I bet he's probably heard these cables and probably doesn't give a sh*t about them one way or the other.
Onhwy61,I would like to say that I am sorry if I offended you with my comments about Jack Kevorkian. I,in no way, ment anythig derogatory toward Dr.Kevorkian, who in my opinion is a very misunderstood humanitarian.

Asa, perhaps you are reading too much Jacques Derrida,just and observation.
Thank you, Jetter.

Yes, you are right - he did not understand. But not because he isn't intelligent - actually I find listening to his mind quite fun and stimilating (!). Rather, its because he sees reality through a prism. A good prism - I love science and am very thankful that we have evolved to live so securely through the power over matter - but the value of that prism should never be used recklessly (the environment and non-human life) or aggressively through the mind's absorption with its power over things(science yelling down the next possible paradigm of perception, even though their own evolutionary evidence says that it is bound to happen).

Yes, I am trying to learn how to talk better and need to learn more. I think I am getting better, but please remind me when I get self-indulgent and talk into my own mirror rather than to another person. I try to bring many different threads together to see an issue from multiple views at once, and this can make the "normal" way of thinking stop sometimes. But sometimes it is not the mind's comprehensive intelligence or vocabulary that is an obstacle, but the sight itself. Knowledge should always seek to point beyond itself. Sometimes we have to squint at first until the thinking mind becomes accustomed to what is seen.

Also, I try to add something that will catalyze a dialogue along, or make someone play fair, usually through Socratic devices that probe but do not threaten. Again, I have not always been this way; if you look at some of my older threads I could get in there and yell with the best of them! I've learned since then, and many people here have helped me with this (have been my teachers...).

Basically, smart people like you and detlof and krusty and gregm and all the others are exciting to me - in the end, regardless of the ideas, it is about meeting. Things can be discovered ("whenever two or more gather in its name...").