MIT Love 'em or Hate 'em

I think something WAS proven here. Anger and a thinly disguised patronising, professoral, attitude is not conducive to communication.
Asa, I think that krusty's annoyance came from his disbelief that any "ignoramus" posting would dare question his erudition and experience -- erudition purportedly evidenced by scientific argumentation at that. He was incredulous that people persisted in questioning...

As you note, his argumentation is inconsistent -- I'd say it's emotional outburst(s) rather than a rational discussion. You took the "rational" view that krusty put forth.

I join Detlof in finding little constructive info -- what there is, is lost to this incredulity and expressed superiority. More's the pity.

Asa, time for me to come clean. You appear to really know your business. There is, however, a possibility that the reason Uncle K did not answer your question is because he did not understand it. What I am trying to say is that I work with mathmaticians, writers, sales people, investment gurus, etc. in a larger company. In general, I don't have a hard time understanding the written word since like many my existance kinda depends on it.

I get glimpses of what you are trying to say, but between the beginning of your longer essays and the end I often fail to get your message and there are times I would like to.

Thanks Greg, If I read you right, we feel the same about the whole matter. Pity Krusty did not really want to talk.

Wow, what a thread. This is a candidate for Audiogon's hall of shame.

By the way, I ask myself why this person never posted before and came on like this. Possibly he has been here before with a different name (I assume this can be done). I also think he succeeded in doing just what he set out to do, tick everyone off. I bet he's probably heard these cables and probably doesn't give a sh*t about them one way or the other.