Problem of compensating with cable a component tone problem?


This thread was actually from a kind of rant by teo_audio in another thread. That post was really the start of a whole other thread. and so here it is.                           
The notion is that some folks err when they buy cables to compensate for tonally odd equipment. Say your preamp is dark sounding. So to may it ll good you buy a 'bright' IC cable. Later you buy a different preamp, and  now your system sounds bright, so you buy a dark sounding speaker cable.. On it goes. all messed up.      
So what is you 'defense' against this kind of error upon error?                       
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++      
To add fuel to the fire. here is a large part of teo_audio original post:                             
""" It’s a careful balancing act of understanding the gear and the cable.

Eg, dark system so you get a cable which exaggerates highs in an edgy fashion and then you thinly you’ve got clarity and balance...but no....

What you’ve really got is two wrongs eq’d out against one another... and the perceived clarity is not signal, it’s actually signal based hash, distortion, and noise.

First the signal is gone missing with the dark gear and then what’s left is distorted into false highs and transients that are bloated and dirty, via the screechy cable. It’s a grotesquery.

Figuring this sort of thing out can take a bit of time.

In the example above, it would be best to start with more neutral gear and then more neutral cables, instead something that plays out like two cars tied together with a rope and each doing burnouts trying to pull each the other way.

When you do it right, then... more music of various quality becomes listenable and you get to train your ears and brain is what is RIGHT, instead of flavored distortion. You have to have the correct signal representation there in order to recognize it, so it’s a catch 22 of a sort. It will take time to lean to hear it.

It’s a big deal, a very big deal, it’s the whole freaking enchilada.

We need more people recognizing these issues in this way.  """
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++     
elizabeth
Post removed 
I pondered on Teo's post last night for a while. What he is saying is absolutely correct. If you start with a compromise to what live music sounds like, it will never be correct. The problem is that equipment manufacturers don't typically advertise their products as being colored so you have to know what live music sounds like to start with in order to recognize the condition. Very good post from Teo which boils down to (IMO); cut your losses if there is an issue instead of trying to mask them with another product. 
Teo is correct.It's not easy to match your components  correctly until you make your mistakes and get some experience.Long ago I was fascinated by cabling and was sure I could achieve my goals if I could just find the proper combination of cabling.It just doesn't work.And it's doubly difficult with having to do most of your shopping online a piece at a time.
I would just say this problem is one good reason to not spend a lot on cables... until you are finally sure the equipment you own are KEEPERS!             
Like when I decided to upgrade, even though I liked my system.. I bought the same brand of speakers, so I would be pretty sure they would behave the same way and sound similar, just better.       
(I went from Magnepan 3.6 to 20.7 speakers) And if i upgrade the amp, it too is going to be a Bryston, maybe newer, maybe bigger, but the same sound, just a little better.
That makes a lot of sense Elizabeth.When you know what you like and want a little more of what you like.Then the cables just hook everything together without causing a problem.Enhancing your system rather than compensating for something.
Seems to me that those of us that pick and choose a variety of cabling we use, do so as to color the sound to our individual liking. That might not be the same way the live music sounded when origionally performed. Not that theres anythning wrong with that.
Compensating factors like cables, tweaks and other after-the-fact adjustments are simply added distortions to the original source signal. It can only be subtractive, not additive. The key is to design, assemble and implement a system that does the least amount of harm to the source in the first place.

Great thread!
Something of a contrarian point of view, perhaps.
Have never heard an audio system of whatever cost that I'd confuse with a live performance...symphony orchestra, jazz ensemble, rock band, solo instrument... well maybe solo instrument.  Constantly pursuing a system that achieves live-quality sound (not talking SPL) in the listening room seems 'tilting at windmills" though I gather this is one of the foundational tenets that's supposed to guide the "hobby".  I don't buy into it and, accordingly, am happy to self-disqualify as an audiophile.    I'm completely happy at home with something that is enjoyable to listen to, that conveys the substance and emotional content of the composition/performance and is informed by live listening experience but that (candidly speaking) falls well short of making me think a chamber music ensemble dropped in unexpectedly.  I'll spend the money on concert tickets for that.  To those that see things otherwise, no problem - hope you get where you want to be.  

As far as cabling...just like component matching (which seems to be audiophile "orthodoxy") I see no reason not to treat cable(s) as another system component that requires matching.  I will also continue to use cable as one more tool for fine-tuning and optimizing the system's sound.  This does not require an unending succession of new cable purchases, by the way.    
Or.... you could build your own speakers and tweak everything in on place, the crossover.

Best,
E
elizabeth
Maggies and Bryston are sonic matches for each other.  Happy Listening!
Hello Elizabeth
How did your determine that they are sonic matches or just two components that cancel each others coloration?  Or is that what you mean by sonic match?

Bailyhill

If it really is a problem component it makes sense.  Replace the component.  To say there is no place for a warm or cool cable assumes a perfectly neutral system.  Own one?  What cables are you using?  Seriously.  
The first priority is to do no harm to the sound.   I think we can all agree that this is the first, or at least a major priority.

The challenge with cabling is, your typical amazon or mono price garbage DOES do harm the to sound.   It can be argued that most cables having brass in the rca or banana plugs, or employing solder, are doing harm.

So adding those effects to a warm sounding component can really get one far from the actual sq of the recording.  It can be a mess for sure.   

@wlutke  installing a warm or cool cable should be akin to adding just enough of a spice to a stew to bring out and enhance the flavor to perfection.It really won't work out to use the cable (or the spice)to transform the system(or stew) into something it's not IMHO.If I felt my system was sounding too analytical,throwing $$ into warmer cabling would give me muddy + analytical.
Hmm....wondering where I can buy some Dark sounding speaker cables, do they sell those on ebay?
jtcf,
 "installing a warm or cool cable should be akin to adding just enough of a spice to a stew to bring out and enhance the flavor to perfection."
Exactly.  No system is neutral.  Next years new components will show you what neutral really is.  ad infinitum.
First I am not sure what neutral sounds like.  I do like harmonic distortion.  I love how my Les Paul sounds like through an old Marshall - see Allman Brothers Filmore East for the sound I like.

That being said, you can influence the sound of any component by swapping out a few resistors or capacitors.  For resistors my favorites are Caddock, Shinkoh, and Vishay.  Capacitors so far my favorite are V-Caps Oil & Copper.  To me this is a much cheaper option that any cable.  You can even get away with caps that are cheaper.  Once you hear the differences, you can tailor the sound to what YOU prefer.  It is really quite simple even if you have little to no idea of what you are doing.  PLUS it is fun to hear the differences and once you know them, then you can adjust the sound as YOU please.  I built a preamp with a selector switch so that you can switch the output resisters on the fly.  That was fund to see the look on peoples faces when they asked, what did you just do.

Happy Listening.
The problem lies in an assumption.  That your, or any system can produce "live sound" music, from a recorded medium on your system no matter how fabulous correct or perfect any of them are. Live sound BTW is variable for the most part, not always. Think of one venue versus another in a string on tour.

After that all bets are off and all personal preferences should be accepted. There is no one correct answer.  I would go on but I really don't want to aggravate people.
@ghosthouse Spot on!

@elizabeth a larger amp from the same manufacturer may not give the same sound as it may have a different [output] topology. It will most certainly be running a different thermal profile on the same speakers.

ALL cables are tone controls and there is no way to avoid it. As such they alter phase and frequency response. Most speakers have terrible phase response and most users have never heard a phase coherent system so they focus solely on frequency response.

ALL electronics interact uniquely with cables. To build a great system requires experience with live acoustic sound, an understanding of the system failings, what is possible and what cable effects are likely given the electronics and transducers. Even the very best systems fail in many areas compared to a live performance.

Most cable advertising copy is utter nonsense. Anyone can claim anything. Engineers laugh at the claims and weep for the ill educated customer.
Compensating - no, fine tuning - yes. 
Not much to talk about, very simple.
@bigkidz 
"That being said, you can influence the sound of any component by swapping out a few resistors or capacitors."

Too true. Spend your money there, I say. Can't afford a $500 capacitor? Then you sure can't afford a $500 cable.

With every upgrade I make, the system sound changes - usually towards refinement and clarity, but sometimes one at the expense of the other. In that case, I change VTA to compensate. Cabling is the last thing I'll mess with - rather after high voltage direct drive to the Quad ESL's.
ieales - Confirmation appreciated.  Good to know I'm not alone in this "madness"  ;-)