Problem of compensating with cable a component tone problem?


This thread was actually from a kind of rant by teo_audio in another thread. That post was really the start of a whole other thread. and so here it is.                           
The notion is that some folks err when they buy cables to compensate for tonally odd equipment. Say your preamp is dark sounding. So to may it ll good you buy a 'bright' IC cable. Later you buy a different preamp, and  now your system sounds bright, so you buy a dark sounding speaker cable.. On it goes. all messed up.      
So what is you 'defense' against this kind of error upon error?                       
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++      
To add fuel to the fire. here is a large part of teo_audio original post:                             
""" It’s a careful balancing act of understanding the gear and the cable.

Eg, dark system so you get a cable which exaggerates highs in an edgy fashion and then you thinly you’ve got clarity and balance...but no....

What you’ve really got is two wrongs eq’d out against one another... and the perceived clarity is not signal, it’s actually signal based hash, distortion, and noise.

First the signal is gone missing with the dark gear and then what’s left is distorted into false highs and transients that are bloated and dirty, via the screechy cable. It’s a grotesquery.

Figuring this sort of thing out can take a bit of time.

In the example above, it would be best to start with more neutral gear and then more neutral cables, instead something that plays out like two cars tied together with a rope and each doing burnouts trying to pull each the other way.

When you do it right, then... more music of various quality becomes listenable and you get to train your ears and brain is what is RIGHT, instead of flavored distortion. You have to have the correct signal representation there in order to recognize it, so it’s a catch 22 of a sort. It will take time to lean to hear it.

It’s a big deal, a very big deal, it’s the whole freaking enchilada.

We need more people recognizing these issues in this way.  """
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++     
elizabeth
Something of a contrarian point of view, perhaps.
Have never heard an audio system of whatever cost that I'd confuse with a live performance...symphony orchestra, jazz ensemble, rock band, solo instrument... well maybe solo instrument.  Constantly pursuing a system that achieves live-quality sound (not talking SPL) in the listening room seems 'tilting at windmills" though I gather this is one of the foundational tenets that's supposed to guide the "hobby".  I don't buy into it and, accordingly, am happy to self-disqualify as an audiophile.    I'm completely happy at home with something that is enjoyable to listen to, that conveys the substance and emotional content of the composition/performance and is informed by live listening experience but that (candidly speaking) falls well short of making me think a chamber music ensemble dropped in unexpectedly.  I'll spend the money on concert tickets for that.  To those that see things otherwise, no problem - hope you get where you want to be.  

As far as cabling...just like component matching (which seems to be audiophile "orthodoxy") I see no reason not to treat cable(s) as another system component that requires matching.  I will also continue to use cable as one more tool for fine-tuning and optimizing the system's sound.  This does not require an unending succession of new cable purchases, by the way.    
Or.... you could build your own speakers and tweak everything in on place, the crossover.

Best,
E
elizabeth
Maggies and Bryston are sonic matches for each other.  Happy Listening!
Hello Elizabeth
How did your determine that they are sonic matches or just two components that cancel each others coloration?  Or is that what you mean by sonic match?

Bailyhill