Harmonic Tech vs Acoustic Zen


Anyone both heard this too brand? Which one is on the
brighter side, more dynamic? Which one gives better
tighter bass, I use truth link and pro silway, I feel
they dont enough bass for my taste.Tonal balance and
vocal is very important to me.I play classical 30%,
20%jazz, vocals and country 30%,20% piano and gospel.
jayctoy
Although I haven't heard any of the AZ IC's, I'll second Bigtee on the HT PS II (however - also like him - I do own and like the AZ Satori). Compared to my Cardas Cross IC, I think full and natural-sounding bass is one of the PS II's strong points, and it is also less bright. Which is a roundabout way of saying I also second him on the system-dependency question.
Bigtee, you must be the only audiophile ever, who thinks the Pro Silway II is better than the Matrix II. No way! The Matrix eats it alive. Does it make any sense that a designer such as Robert Lee with his obvious talents in design and listening would start his own company and then design a cable that doesn't even sound as good as his older design? I owned Pro Silway IIs, and they were brighter, thinner, less coherent, and generally inferior to the Matrix.

As far as the Silver Zen, I suggest people read the many comments on that cable in the forums here. Most people comment, as I would, that there is no brightness, just the highest of resolution.
Saxo, you must be the only audiophile ever who knows the absolute truth.

Folks, you need look no further.
thanks everyone for all your information,this gave me
a good idea the sonic of both brand, Sorry also for
putting this on the amp and preamp forum.
Drubin, what a clever and intelligent comment. Perhaps you should win an award.