Harmonic Tech vs Acoustic Zen

Bigtee, you must be the only audiophile ever, who thinks the Pro Silway II is better than the Matrix II. No way! The Matrix eats it alive. Does it make any sense that a designer such as Robert Lee with his obvious talents in design and listening would start his own company and then design a cable that doesn't even sound as good as his older design? I owned Pro Silway IIs, and they were brighter, thinner, less coherent, and generally inferior to the Matrix.

As far as the Silver Zen, I suggest people read the many comments on that cable in the forums here. Most people comment, as I would, that there is no brightness, just the highest of resolution.

Saxo, you must be the only audiophile ever who knows the absolute truth.

Folks, you need look no further.

thanks everyone for all your information,this gave me
a good idea the sonic of both brand, Sorry also for
putting this on the amp and preamp forum.

Drubin, what a clever and intelligent comment. Perhaps you should win an award.

A little more description of differences in my system. When I had the HT PS II a couple years ago I thought it was great IC no need to spend silly money to improve, got used pair of AZ Silver Ref here (after reading all the rave reviews)thinking there wouldn't be much diff and I could resell easy enough.

First listen it was easy to hear a very noticeable positive difference, the soundstage was 10-25% bigger and I was getting all the detail like before but the overall sound was much more relaxed natural......I was hooked and sold my HT PS II.

As I said before overall tonally the HT PS II has more treble energy (but not more detail) therefore could be useful in system that tends to be too warm/rich.

As far as bass I really didn't notice a big difference between the two cables......for me both are very good in this area.