Possibly another reason to have 2 subs is that its much easier to dial in a truly flat frequency response in room when you have two to smooth out nulls and gaps. For a multi channel room where you have multiple listening positions, you should also attempt to average out the flattest fr not just for the sweet spot but also the other listeners positions. This is much more doable with 2 subs than just the one Also would like to add that I know of an individual who just sold their DD18's and are moving to the dd15's for better integration with their main speakers for the above reasons, and financial considerations are not a factor. When you look at the specs for both the DD15 and DD18, they both use the same sized magnet motor, both 24 lbs. With the same sized motor, I'd rather have a smaller driver with the same size magnet controling it than a larger, anyday. Now, if the magnet were larger for the DD18 then it may be more of a horserace. I do believe also that there is something to trying not to jump up too large in size with the subwwoofer from your the size drivers in your mains. My experience with the B&W 801Nautilus which in my previous listening room the bass just never integrated well with the rest of the speaker. IMO it was just too large a driver when compared to the mid. The 802N was a better integrated speaker IMO.
I am considering a Velodyne DD-18...
...to complement my Joseph RM25 siII speakers. When I went looking for speakers with more bottom end the dealer who sold me the Josephs said that in my room, 16'X13'X9', I'd have trouble with resonations. He suggested that a sub that could be tuned to the room would give better results. After much reading, I'm gravitating toward the dd-18 but I have heard it said that a smaller room may prefer the dd-15. I assume that the dd-18 will better reproduce the very, very bottom end and that the equalizer eliminates the issue with the room size. Anyone have opinions on the above? Thanks for any replies.
- ...
- 16 posts total
- 16 posts total

