Silverline Sonata III & McIntosh MC275?


I am planning to upgrade my speakers and I am just wondering if this combination works?

I currently have the Sonata I now and the C-220 / MC275 combo works quite well with them. Haven't seen much of the McIntosh & Silverline combos around. I heard that the Sonata III are totally different than the old Sonata I. What are the sonic-differences in between them two? I researched and researched and was so discouraged just because I haven't found any info with a system which consist the two, or even a person who tried this combo... Would like to get some advice before making the purchase. Thanks!
infinity_audio
Blindjim and I have differing viewpoints regarding the Sonata III and amplification matches, which just goes to illustrate that we all have different preferences.

I also own Sonata III. I tried a handful of amps with them, including two tube amps: VAC 160 MusicBlocs (160 wpc KT88), and Atma-Sphere M-60 (60 wpc OTL). In all cases, a Lamm L2 Reference preamp was used.
Neither amp produced a balanced tonal response. In each case, bass was loose and uncontrolled, and was reproduced with less volume than were midrange and treble frequencies. The result was a tipped up sound.

For me, the absolute best match is Pass Labs XA-60.5 Class A solid state amps. Tremendously controlled and fully realized bass. Superb tonal balance. Alan Yun voices his speakers with Pass Labs, and he demonstrates them with Pass Labs at audio shows. He recommended Pass Labs to me when I asked about amplification. For several months I resisted spending the money and tried to find less expensive alternatives. Belles solid state amplification worked well, as did a couple of digital amps. However, in the end, Pass Labs was so clearly superior that I wrote the check.

That's my experience with the Sonata III. As I wrote initially, Blindjim has a different point of view, and frankly, I don't think either of us is right or wrong. It comes down to the listener.

If I had to do it all over again, I'd buy what I consider to be a more tube friendly speaker with a minimum nominal impedance of 8 ohms and a flat impedance curve (Sonata III do not have a flat impedance curve).
I would love to get a X250 to match my Sonata III but my space really doesn't allow a unit this big. I am keeping my MC275, i like the classic McIntosh sound when matched with my C220. Therefore, I really would like to keep my amplification set up. As I am pretty comfortable with the sound now, I am curious to know if going to a Sonata III will be an upgrade or not with the MACs. Seriously... there isn't a mac and sonata combo around... not one...
There is an Audiogon member who had a MAC 2275/Sonata III combo. I've been wracking my brain trying to remember his moniker. Perhaps he'll read this thread and chime in...
Member "Velo62"!

I am 98% certain he had a MC2275/Sonata III combo for a while.

Send him an email.
You want to know the sonic differences between the I and the III. Unless some one here has actually owned both you may have to rely on a mixing of the reviews on Soundstage (I believe) and 6moons. I like Potis' comments on 6moons. I bought the Bolero's and found his review of them, right after he reviewed the III's, to be very fair in its description. I have no reason to believe that his review of the III's would be far from the mark. From what he said, I would be cautious in matching them to a Mac 275 unless you know in advance that the tone would be to your liking. From what I have heard, the original Sonata, and its successor the II's had a warmer tone with somewhat lower resolution than the III's.

FWIW.