Class D Technology


So I get the obvious strengths of Class D. Efficiency, power output & running cool which allows for small form factors. I also understand the weaknesses somewhat. 1. Non-linear & lots of distortion that needs to be cleaned up with an output filter. 
So my question is, if it weren't for efficiency & power, would there be any reason to own a Class D amp? Do they beat Class A in any other categories that count for sound quality?  
seanheis1
I have a couple of Class D integrated amps: Peachtree Nova125 & NAD Master M2.  They are very different in quality IMO.

The Peachtree soundwise is pretty good.  Perhaps, it does have a little harshness some associate with Class D when compared to good Class A amps. However, I may have a unit specific problem with the DAC portion, which may be to blame for this (I will have to sort out with Peachtree). It also can get slightly congested with complex passages (bands & orchestras) at higher volumes. At it's price point, it does an excellent job. There would not be many/any Class A amps at this price, unless you bought some older, used ones.  It also does have a great feature set for digital inputs (only one analog).

The NAD M2 is a very, very, fine amplifier.  It is not a typical Class D amp, more of a powered DAC, using a relatively new technology.  It is very musical, which is not typical in Class D amps. It is absolutely dead silent when no signal is played, which makes it extremely dynamic. Very detailed, excellent bass control, mids are rich and authentic.  Makes high quality recordings sound exceptional. Given that it all you need is a source, the M2, and speakers, it is extraordinary value. (See glowing reviews in Stereophile and Absolute Sound that explain the technology)

Main drawback of the M2 is that it does not have a USB input, so a S/PDIF bridge is required in that case.  It does have both RCA & XLR analog inputs if required. The analog signals will undergo an A/D conversion because everything is digital in the amp, so purists may object. Personally, I don't notice any degradation when fed an analog signal. 

IN summary, the Peachtree is good value for the price, but (with my unit) may not satisfy those willing to spend big dollars on high-end Class A or Class A/B amps. The NAD M2 (costing several thousand more than the Nova125) is a good challenger for Class A & A/B amps costing quite substantially higher. Definitely worth auditioning. I believe it is no longer manufactured, but newer NAD products will use the technology.
In my personal opinion, I think the very best sounding Class D amp out there right now are the Classe Sigma Mono's.  However, I still think a  Class A,  a Class A/AB,  or  a  Class AB amp will still at this point in time beat sound wise any Class D amp, but I'm talking Class A amps of the high end order vs Class D amp also built by a high end manufacturer.  Of course a high end manufacturer's high end Class D amp will beat a mid-Fi companies Class AB amp. I don't think any mid-Fi or low-fi company builds any pure Class A amp's as I'm sure all of us already knows that.
I own NuForce mono block class D amps.  They were cited by Absolute Sound as "amp of the year" several years ago. Combined with a tube preamplifier and old Dalquist DQ 20 speakers, the sound is remarkable.  I listen mostly to Classical music and find the rendering more lifelike than with any other amp I've owned.
Unforced must pump a lot of money into absolutes sound to purchase that moniker.  :)

its a joke my my fellow Americans, as I know if I didn't say so, you would all be butt hurt. :)
Nu force must pump a lot of money into absolutes sound to purchase that moniker.  :)

its a joke my my fellow Americans, as I know if I didn't say so, you would all be butt hurt. :)


i heard some class D monos, they were just ok, nothing special.
tiny lack of upper treble , midrange was ok, bass was good. 

Would BUy if they ever stop making AB amps :)