Wilson Audio Haters

I went down and took a close look at all my equipment. All components were 3 dimensional, having a H, W and D. :-)

When my friends come to hear my system, comments I most often get refer to the holography of the soundstage. That soundstage, and dynamics are two aspects that I strive to maximize. For this I believe the room, and equipment placement within, to be critical. Not that I could argue that there is no difference between components in this regard. Differences that can't be measured exist. Due to the nature of the characteristic under measurement  and the resolution of the measuring device.
 
Obviously, other aspects are also important. I enjoy a tight and articulate bass (quality over quantity), a smooth cohesive midrange, and a relaxed upper end (not over stated). To this end I focus on products that provide these things. To get the most of this within my budget I sacrifice the bottom end, believing I can't afford the bottom octave.      

Dear Mesch,

audio is all about collecting the right stuff togheter. It costs  time and devotion to create it. 

It is very easy to F. up a 3 dimensional system into a 2 dimensional system.

have a nice Christmas

Dear Dave,

my religion is very important in my life as well. That is why I protect each single client. And I will always do the best I can to give them the best possible for the money they spend.

In the last years I met too many people who were not advised on a honest and respectful way. That is why I would like to see a more open and honest world in audio.

This only can be achieved when people have more respect to the people who buy their products. 

have a nice Christmas.

I don't hate the Wilson's per se, it's their price vs. performance.

I think they are just fine. Maybe not the smoothest or airy-est (two different things) on the top end, but certainly have good dynamic range.

I do find them over-bearing. Their largest speakers are certainly only meant for royalty with listening rooms that can do them justice.

Best,


Erik