Class D is just Dandy!

BTW, I have no particular opinion on ML amps, but the generalized claims Fremer made in the article were just not true anymore for Class D amps.

Whether any reader here likes a particular amp or not, well, OK, I can't argue with that. But the general issues with Class D amps of the 1980's were long solved by 2013, despite some people being unwilling to let go of the same old myths.

Best,

E

But the general issues with Class D amps of the 1980’s were long solved by 2013,

Please tell us all the issues they (who) solved?

Cheers George

Hey, georgehifi, maybe you should reread the initial post which started this thread. If you have issues with class d, you are in the wrong place.

That discussion belongs in another thread, George, but practically everything you complain about on a weekly basis. Hahahaha

This thread is for talking about Class D amps we actually like.

Best,


E

This is an open forum, I believe that Class-d should be seen from both sides of the camp, not censored to just the pro-camp, this way members can make up their own minds whether or not to get one, because all do not see "Class-D as being just dandy".
  
Maybe soon in the future when the switching frequency can be raised double or tripple with advancement in semi conductor technology, so then it’s output filter can do it’s job properly without negative effect to the upper mids and highs.

Cheers George