Thanks for the response.
Jim
Directionality of wire
Thank you for the excellent question. AudioQuest provided an NRG-10 AC cable for the evaluation. Like all AudioQuest cables, our AC cables use solid conductors that are carefully controlled for low-noise directionality. We see this as a benefit for all applications -- one that becomes especially important when discussing our Niagara units. Because our AC cables use conductors that have been properly controlled for low-noise directionality, they complement the Niagara System’s patented Ground-Noise Dissipation Technology. Other AC cables would work, but may or may not allow the Niagara to reach its full potential. If you'd like more information on our use of directionality to minimize the harmful effects of high-frequency noise, please visit http://www.audioquest.com/directionality-its-all-about-noise/ or the Niagara 1000's owner's manual (available on our website).
Thanks again.
Stephen Mejias
AudioQuest
Read more at https://www.stereophile.com/content/gramophone-dreams-15-audioquest-niagara-1000-hifiman-he1000-v2-p...
terry9terry9, thanks for the response. By chance did you read the AA link? Re: maybe rcrump... I don’t know, but... rcrump 06:45:41 09/30/00 (11) If you run the signal and return wires in the same direction you will end up with hot spots in the stage, normally at or close to the speakers, low image height and have a gaping hole in the middle of the stage...Keep in mind I am referring to the sound of the stage (reflections) not the individual instruments spread across the stage....https://www.audioasylum.com/cgi/t.mpl?f=cables&m=12332 When you get a chance read the jadem6 "DIY interconnect review" thread. That guy spent a lot of hours and money experimenting with different designs making ICs. https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/diy-interconnects-review#Jadem6 cheers, Jim |
One more comment on the guy's comment about directionality of dielectric material. He used the term polarity/directionality which is actually a bit of a misnomer since directionality isn't polarity at all. We know what correct polarity and inverted polarity are and directionality of fuses or cable or wire is neither. |
Quoted from AA:On the other hand, though, if the signal and return wires are run in opposite directions (relative to what came off of the spool), then if the cable is constructed in a symmetrical manner (i.e., both conductors identical, and not having a shield grounded at just one end), then reversing the direction of the cable should make no difference **even if** the conductors are intrinsically directional. Unless, that is, the dielectric (as opposed to the conductors) somehow causes a difference. If the two conductors in a symmetrically designed cable are run in opposite directions (relative to what came off of the spool), then no matter which way the cable is connected the two conductors will **both** always be in the allegedly "correct" direction for half of each cycle, and the allegedly "incorrect" direction for the other half of each cycle. That follows from what I said in an earlier post in this thread: Almarg 8-14-2017(To add context, I had put quotation marks around "the current" to distinguish it from the electromagnetic energy of "the signal," that is conducted via the dielectric). So the AA member’s statement seems to me to be self-contradictory. He’s saying that wires are directional, but putting the two wires in directions that would allow the cable to exhibit their alleged directionality will produce bad results. Best regards, -- Al |