Are future improvements in Amp/PreAmps slowing to a crawl?

@geoffkait
Awwww! Ya see! That’s why we get along so well! You say totally crazy things like you totally believe them, and you’re not bothered at all that you’re a laughing stock! Roger there is all "I invented imaging!" and is real serious about his fantasies. You’re more light-hearted, Geoff. But just know, when your leg gets wet from me humping it, that’s really piss from me laughing so hard.

kosst

And in 48 years you haven't achieved any success or praise for your audio expertise, but you're about to teach the true greats in the field some big lessons, eh?

As a matter of fact - Yes.
This brings us back to the egg on your face moment that's coming down the pike like an 18 wheeler.

Please kosst for Gods sake man - you are in a nose dive like you have no idea. You are making it worse on yourself.

Think about this for a moment. Just humor me.
What if everything I've told you is true and accurate?
Including that there are no designers that are even close to creating what I have made.

Wouldn't that be something?
The good news (for audiophiles) is that it really is here.

On that note I would suggest that we call a truce on beating a dead horse because its getting nowhere fast.

Lets wait and see what happens next and then you can react.

@roger_paul 
No. I don't think so, Roger. I don't like you, and I don't like you because I think you're a liar. There is some debate as to whether you're smart enough to realize you're full of crap. I think you're a liar committed to a series of misunderstandings because you've decided to trademark that misunderstanding and call it "H-CAT". Set aside all of your technical claims that to this point haven't withstood scrutiny and the most basic claims of your system make no sense. Your system reproduces 3D sounds for instance. It's like you honestly don't know that's what most of us out here are experiencing with the gear we've got. You present the concept like it's some epic breakthrough to a world that's never experienced such a thing. WE HAVE. I'm about to again in a little while when I plop myself down in front of the rig. 
Your confusion seems to begin there, with the kind of stereo imaging two channel aficionados have long expected from gear, and it only explodes into more and more nonsensical theories and explanations that both defy comprehension and violate the laws of physics. I think you speak in the cryptic jargon you use because you haven't researched the phenomenon you think you're explaining. You arrogantly presume you've stumbled onto some new branch of physics or something and have the audacity to invent the language. The problem is that you can't even set forth the mathematical theory for what you claim you're doing. You can't even vaguely describe the circuit. You can't compose your explanations in scientific terms. 
Rather than accept the onslaught of valid and well reasoned criticism brought before you, you hunker down even more. You bury yourself deeper in your nonsensical terminology and misunderstandings. You make unequivocal technical claims, but feel you have no obligation to prove those claims. What branch of science or research is that acceptable? "Nowhere" is the answer. It's an unacceptable attitude and course of action for an expert and professional. 
And nowhere is pretty much the only place you're going to go with this stuff. So take your cheap shots, cast your insults, make it personal, or even threaten me. We know what you are, Roger. YOU have revealed that yourself. I've merely given you the ample opportunity to do so. That's been my only goal here. 

kosst

Rather than accept the onslaught of valid and well reasoned criticism brought before you, you hunker down even more.

Oh you mean like -

I don't like you because I think you're a liar.

Or

There is some debate as to whether you're smart enough to realize you're full of crap.

Or

I'm pretty sure everybody here has concluded you're a fraud

Or

We all see you have no clothes.

It sounds like you have quite a crowd there - who are you "debating" with? The voices in your head?

You brag you work in values of picovolts, but you can't prove it.

I have to admit you might have me on that one.

You arrogantly presume you've stumbled onto some new branch of physics or something and have the audacity to invent the language

The results I have gotten are from my endless hours of dedication to a single concept. I did not "stumble" into anything. The final circuit I ended up with was my target from the beginning - not an accident.

I have figured out the correct configuration of the right components to produce live music. I was able to do this simply because I knew it was possible.

This body of work includes what I have learned about how the ear-brain perceives something as "live" That understanding has helped shape the concept and implementation of an automatic focus system.

And now all that work has paid off.
The future got here sooner that you thought. 
Sorry but just like Hillary - you going to have to get over it. 

kosst

You present the concept like it's some epic breakthrough to a world that's never experienced such a thing

I know that is hard to swallow but yes that pretty much sums it up.
On several occasions there have been people who after listening to such a system have had tears of joy. Only live music can touch that nerve.