@roger_paul
No. I don't think so, Roger. I don't like you, and I don't like you because I think you're a liar. There is some debate as to whether you're smart enough to realize you're full of crap. I think you're a liar committed to a series of misunderstandings because you've decided to trademark that misunderstanding and call it "H-CAT". Set aside all of your technical claims that to this point haven't withstood scrutiny and the most basic claims of your system make no sense. Your system reproduces 3D sounds for instance. It's like you honestly don't know that's what most of us out here are experiencing with the gear we've got. You present the concept like it's some epic breakthrough to a world that's never experienced such a thing. WE HAVE. I'm about to again in a little while when I plop myself down in front of the rig.
Your confusion seems to begin there, with the kind of stereo imaging two channel aficionados have long expected from gear, and it only explodes into more and more nonsensical theories and explanations that both defy comprehension and violate the laws of physics. I think you speak in the cryptic jargon you use because you haven't researched the phenomenon you think you're explaining. You arrogantly presume you've stumbled onto some new branch of physics or something and have the audacity to invent the language. The problem is that you can't even set forth the mathematical theory for what you claim you're doing. You can't even vaguely describe the circuit. You can't compose your explanations in scientific terms.
Rather than accept the onslaught of valid and well reasoned criticism brought before you, you hunker down even more. You bury yourself deeper in your nonsensical terminology and misunderstandings. You make unequivocal technical claims, but feel you have no obligation to prove those claims. What branch of science or research is that acceptable? "Nowhere" is the answer. It's an unacceptable attitude and course of action for an expert and professional.
And nowhere is pretty much the only place you're going to go with this stuff. So take your cheap shots, cast your insults, make it personal, or even threaten me. We know what you are, Roger. YOU have revealed that yourself. I've merely given you the ample opportunity to do so. That's been my only goal here.
No. I don't think so, Roger. I don't like you, and I don't like you because I think you're a liar. There is some debate as to whether you're smart enough to realize you're full of crap. I think you're a liar committed to a series of misunderstandings because you've decided to trademark that misunderstanding and call it "H-CAT". Set aside all of your technical claims that to this point haven't withstood scrutiny and the most basic claims of your system make no sense. Your system reproduces 3D sounds for instance. It's like you honestly don't know that's what most of us out here are experiencing with the gear we've got. You present the concept like it's some epic breakthrough to a world that's never experienced such a thing. WE HAVE. I'm about to again in a little while when I plop myself down in front of the rig.
Your confusion seems to begin there, with the kind of stereo imaging two channel aficionados have long expected from gear, and it only explodes into more and more nonsensical theories and explanations that both defy comprehension and violate the laws of physics. I think you speak in the cryptic jargon you use because you haven't researched the phenomenon you think you're explaining. You arrogantly presume you've stumbled onto some new branch of physics or something and have the audacity to invent the language. The problem is that you can't even set forth the mathematical theory for what you claim you're doing. You can't even vaguely describe the circuit. You can't compose your explanations in scientific terms.
Rather than accept the onslaught of valid and well reasoned criticism brought before you, you hunker down even more. You bury yourself deeper in your nonsensical terminology and misunderstandings. You make unequivocal technical claims, but feel you have no obligation to prove those claims. What branch of science or research is that acceptable? "Nowhere" is the answer. It's an unacceptable attitude and course of action for an expert and professional.
And nowhere is pretty much the only place you're going to go with this stuff. So take your cheap shots, cast your insults, make it personal, or even threaten me. We know what you are, Roger. YOU have revealed that yourself. I've merely given you the ample opportunity to do so. That's been my only goal here.