1. Home
  2. misc-audio
  3. 126413-87702

Vinyl VS Digital

After 20+ years I broke out my turn table from the 70's again.  I have been mostly listening to CD and streaming music for the last 15 years on higher end gear in a dedicated and treated home theater room.  I also have a dedicated two channel system in the same room.  

All the hype surrounding analog has prompted to me to purchase a dedicated preamp so that I could once again hook up my TT.  I also purchased an Aurlic Aries to compare.  I'm ready to upgrade my old Technics SL 1600 MK2 running a Grace Cartridge.  But I have concerns.  

I could care less about the additional hiss, crackle and Pop thats not in digital.  I think its cool to put on an album and just listen to my 30 year old small collection from when I was a teenager.    

I started doing A/B comparisons by switching between the TT and the Aries (FLAC).  I even bought new vinyl to do so.  The thing keeping me from going "All In" is the imaging.  No matter what I do with (aligning the cartridge), I cannot get the imaging to match that of digital.  Specifically, voice and instrument that stems from center stage with digital cannot be reproduced with the TT as source.  One might say the stage is wider but its too wide to point where definition is lost.  Don't get me wrong it still sounds good but is it right?  Is it my TT or is it in the recording.  Or is this the difference I am suppose to be hearing?


  
ap_wannabe
elizabeth
6,726 posts
 
At this point why get rid of the records? You already kept them through the dark Winter of LP misery.The fact is if one changed their mind and wanted the LPs back, say in five years, They would cost you an arm and a leg. I can see if downsizing a home, or no place to keep them. I keep my 4,000 LPs on the bedroom wall! Just to leave room for ME in my living room. When I had 13,000 LPs, they took over the whole place..When I had to move, getting rid of half plus was a smart move. (almost all tossed were Classical, or dups) But now, even though I do not listen to them much, I would still do all the work of moving the 4000 gems I still own just to be able to play one when I get ’in the mood’.
basement
245 posts
 
I'm a bit confused:

Going "all" in for one doesn't mean having to give up the other. I can see not wanting to spend half on two as opposed to all on one. But why give up or get rid of something? 

Some choices just don't have to be made.

One way to maybe look at it...you have 200 albums. makes sense to at least have a bit invested to take advantage of being able to listen to them. 

Back in the day, the only reason it was important to me to have a CD rig was to have the most music available to me.
uberwaltz's avatar
uberwaltz
4,946 posts
 
Totally agree with last two posts.

My sources comprise of;
Vinyl, cassette, cd and Tidal/Deezer streaming.
So two analog, two digital.

I found by far the easiest way is just to live with the differences period.
I do not care if analog sounds like a digital version and vice versa and have no intention of ever trying to even make them sound the same.
I have a modest amount invested in each source and I am more than happy with my sq.
Are there better playback options for each of the sources I have than I am using right now?
Absolutely and as finances and availability allow I do upgrade where possible and practical.
Of course somebody whose whole rig revolves around say Vinyl only SHOULD have better sq than my TT setup will produce but that is not a point I am remotely worried about.
ap_wannabe OP
15 posts
 
I guess my thinking is most of what I have is CD and even more in FLAC.  I enjoy Roon which does a great job merging my FLAC collection with Tidal. Probably 90% of all listening time is either spent looking for new tracks or playing the playlists I spent so long creating.  Spending the digital first makes sense for me.   

I also figure if I spend on analog I am also going to want more records which of course means more money and more clutter.  My wife already thinks I'm crazy, after all she could be going on a cruise with this spend, right?  

If I had 4000 records, I would surely be "all in" on analog and long ago.  

ejr1953
542 posts
 
ap_wannabe,

I've had a DirectStream DAC since they first came out, and one thing I've learned about digital is that the quality of the AC power makes a significant difference to the level of detail and the sound quality.

I used to have a PS Audio P10 Power Plant, and just took advantage of The Music Room's upgrade to the new P15 unit, am happy that I did.

Back in the day I had a part-time job at a recording studio and I remember the engineers mastering for vinyl, having to reduce the bass on some tracks, place the bass in both channels, reduce the dynamic range (so they wouldn't ask too much of the cutting head), and sometimes reduce the intensity of things like drum hits, so the music would "fit" on a disk.  I think I do appreciate why so many audiophiles enjoy listening to vinyl, I just find that, with the PS Audio stuff I own, that most digital (to me) sounds better.
More to discover