Blocking the propaganda


I have a friend who lives in the boondocks who is without question the foremost expert in this Country on a certain vintage turntable. I will leave the particulars out so as to avoid making him the focus of this discussion or letting someone else figure out who I am talking about. He said something to me recently that I always knew on a certain level but have not seen "transparently" until his comment. His statement is this; "audio magazines including Stereophile are useful for birdcages and if you run out of toilet paper and nothing else". This was in the context of discussing Mike Fremer's preference for 9" arms. I have concluded that he is absolutely correct, but only for those who have the guts to really dive into audio with open eyes and willing to expend the effort to focus all of their attention and for lack of a better word, devotion, to figuring out the truth for themselves. This person I speak of has unquestionably done that. He has engineered his own products that make his turntable of choice as good as it can get. He thinks outside the box. Convention or "accepted thought" mean nothing to him. The analogy that comes to mind is wine. I know of many who will not buy a wine unless some critic has given it a 90 or above. When someone points out how silly it is to rely on published numbers from someone they don't know, they claim that they rely on experts and numerical ratings because they lack the patience, time and resources to taste wine options for themselves. What it boils down to is intellectual laziness. I intend to filter out 100% of what I read in magazines and even audio boards as absolutely unreliable. I have no doubt that I will fall short, but it is a lofty goal nonetheless. We all ought to forge our own trail(s) with sweat and effort and open minds and avoid laziness. Apologies to those who don't appreciate sermons. 
128x128fsonicsmith
While I agree in essence with original post I have to wonder about it's practicality. But if that's how someone wants to live their life who am I to argue?
Who has time to test every audio product available before purchase? Some guidance in narrowing down the lists can be helpful.

When you are getting older and closer to dying...  And, you think that now is all we get?  If you have lots of money?  You will spend all it takes to try to distract yourself away from your deepest fear.  "What a beautiful shiny tonearm!"..."Now I need something else that is the very best (expensive) to keep me distracted."    etc.. etc.

I think their fear of dying drives them. They need to own the very best now.  Mix that with having money, and audio manufacturers will oblige that dark need. They feel its almost their duty to charge exorbitant amounts to make this slowly dying soul feel something which is all absorbing.      And, then they die.
Although Michael Fremer’s attitude occasionally deserves a raised eyebrow or two, how did his personality become a topic of this thread?

Does everybody on this thread even agree what "high-end" means? I asked on multiple threads what high-end is and I have never gotten an answer. Just like amg56 I have gotten many labels for myself, though.

Does anyone think that pictures of equipment, in Stereophile at least, do not help figuring out how the piece looks like? Angles are usually not conductive to getting a true idea of the looks.
I like the audiophile mags, and I like audiophile discussion forums.
Without the Absolute Sound, I might never have found Harbeth speakers. Or chosen the AudioQuest Dragonfly as my dac. Each on opposite ends of the price spectrum, but both major players in my happiness.

Because they make the music I love sound amazing.

PS: one unsung thing about the audiophile mags is how much music i’ve discovered through their reviews of equipment. Great.
More to discover