But what is illustrated clearly, here, prof... is that you consistently argue from a position that you don’t even have the fundamentals of -correctly in hand and mind.
You’ve illustrated that you don’t know the difference between subjectivity and objectivity and what each are in the realm of science.
If that does not expose an underlying deep incompetence in the logic of your arguments.... I don’t know what does.
For a guy who likes to talk the idea of science you keep going back to trying to undermine another’s logic with feints into logic but they are actually your own circular hot air.
I don’t have to argue science and logic and data with you. No need, so far. You trip up and faceplant on the most obvious of the basics...all on your own. I merely point it out.
You decided to try and get personal, so there's some direct & personal -- for you.
You’ve illustrated that you don’t know the difference between subjectivity and objectivity and what each are in the realm of science.
If that does not expose an underlying deep incompetence in the logic of your arguments.... I don’t know what does.
For a guy who likes to talk the idea of science you keep going back to trying to undermine another’s logic with feints into logic but they are actually your own circular hot air.
I don’t have to argue science and logic and data with you. No need, so far. You trip up and faceplant on the most obvious of the basics...all on your own. I merely point it out.
You decided to try and get personal, so there's some direct & personal -- for you.